Show simple item record

contributor authorTonmoy Sarker
contributor authorCristina Poleacovschi
contributor authorToby N. T. Nelson
contributor authorKaty Swalwell
contributor authorJoseph Svec
contributor authorMollie H. Appelgate
contributor authorChrista Jackson
contributor authorKristen Cetin
date accessioned2024-04-27T22:44:21Z
date available2024-04-27T22:44:21Z
date issued2024/04/01
identifier other10.1061-JCEECD.EIENG-1748.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297380
description abstractCivil engineering students in the United States rarely receive instruction about how their work affects social inequities. Indeed, research reveals that most engineering students lack critical consciousness and fail to recognize and analyze real social inequity challenges as they arise in engineering contexts. As history demonstrates, this can lead to engineering projects that exacerbate inequality, ignore community questions and concerns, or fail to consider the consequences of communities when assessing project success. A key component to addressing these issues includes educators’ ability to evaluate the critical consciousness (CC) of civil engineering students using survey approaches. Toward this goal, this research tested a critical consciousness scale for civil engineers (CCSCE). The CCSCE scale summarizes and factorizes 46 items that capture systems of oppression in civil engineering. The instrument included three indicators measuring critical consciousness (i.e., Critical Reflection: Perceived Inequality; Critical Reflection: Egalitarianism; and Critical Action: Sociopolitical Perception). The CCSCE scale was tested with 150 students at two universities in the United States. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a set of 15 items measuring critical reflection and action items. This study supports the development of concise measures of CC for civil engineers that is valid and reliable. The development of a CCSCE scale is vital for civil engineering education as it provides educators with an instrument to assess whether any educational interventions aimed at enhancing CC are indeed efficacious. The instrument can also be used to assess Accreditation Board of Engineering & Technology (ABET) learning Outcomes 2 and 4.
publisherASCE
titleValidating a Critical Consciousness Scale for Civil Engineers
typeJournal Article
journal volume150
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Civil Engineering Education
identifier doi10.1061/JCEECD.EIENG-1748
journal fristpage04023011-1
journal lastpage04023011-10
page10
treeJournal of Civil Engineering Education:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record