YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Metric Systems for Performance Evaluation of Active Learning Kriging Configurations for Reliability Analysis

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 002::page 04024024-1
    Author:
    Koosha Khorramian
    ,
    Fadi Oudah
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1034
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: In active learning Kriging (AK) reliability-based analysis, a surrogate model is trained in a stepwise manner and used to evaluate the reliability of the desired system by reducing the computational cost of analysis. While extensive studies were conducted on advancing the AK reliability methods by developing new learning functions, limited work studied the effect of AK configuration on the accuracy, efficiency, and consistency of the AK reliability analysis. AK configuration is defined herein as a unique set of Kriging correlation, Kriging regression, learning function, and AK reliability method for the AK procedure. This paper presents six metric systems to evaluate the performance of AK reliability analysis based on AK configurations including the comprehensive metric system (CMS), the weighted metric system (WMS) with local optimized weights or average optimized weights (LOW or AOW), and modified desirability function, and two original desirability functions used for multiple response optimization. The ranking optimizes four scaled indexes as measures of accuracy, efficiency, and consistency of the reliability analysis. The metrics are developed and applied to four diverse examples, where a total of 14,400 AK reliability analyses were considered. The results show the validity of the metric systems to rank AK configurations based on their performance.
    • Download: (7.360Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Metric Systems for Performance Evaluation of Active Learning Kriging Configurations for Reliability Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297233
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKoosha Khorramian
    contributor authorFadi Oudah
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:40:38Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:40:38Z
    date issued2024/06/01
    identifier other10.1061-AJRUA6.RUENG-1034.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297233
    description abstractIn active learning Kriging (AK) reliability-based analysis, a surrogate model is trained in a stepwise manner and used to evaluate the reliability of the desired system by reducing the computational cost of analysis. While extensive studies were conducted on advancing the AK reliability methods by developing new learning functions, limited work studied the effect of AK configuration on the accuracy, efficiency, and consistency of the AK reliability analysis. AK configuration is defined herein as a unique set of Kriging correlation, Kriging regression, learning function, and AK reliability method for the AK procedure. This paper presents six metric systems to evaluate the performance of AK reliability analysis based on AK configurations including the comprehensive metric system (CMS), the weighted metric system (WMS) with local optimized weights or average optimized weights (LOW or AOW), and modified desirability function, and two original desirability functions used for multiple response optimization. The ranking optimizes four scaled indexes as measures of accuracy, efficiency, and consistency of the reliability analysis. The metrics are developed and applied to four diverse examples, where a total of 14,400 AK reliability analyses were considered. The results show the validity of the metric systems to rank AK configurations based on their performance.
    publisherASCE
    titleMetric Systems for Performance Evaluation of Active Learning Kriging Configurations for Reliability Analysis
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume10
    journal issue2
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1034
    journal fristpage04024024-1
    journal lastpage04024024-23
    page23
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian