YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Impact of Ergodic and Nonergodic Ground Motion Estimation on the Earthquake Resilience of Shared Distributed Energy Resource Systems

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 001::page 04023061-1
    Author:
    Chenying Liu
    ,
    Jorge Macedo
    ,
    Albert Kottke
    ,
    Luis Ceferino
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1163
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Distributed energy resource systems (DERs), such as rooftop solar panels, are gaining traction in the energy sector to improve infrastructure resilience to earthquakes by facilitating electricity sharing in seismic regions (e.g., California). The seismic risk assessment of DERs requires estimating ground motion intensity measures (IMs) using ground motion models (GMMs). In this context, a few existing efforts have used ergodic GMMs, which assume that the distribution of IMs over time (across multiple events) at a single site is the same as that of ground motion IMs over space (across multiple sites). However, with the advent of large ground motion databases, it has become evident that ground motions are influenced by location-specific repeatable effects, motivating a gradual transition into nonergodic approaches that can capture these effects. However, the impact of these approaches (i.e., ergodic and nonergodic) on the seismic risk assessment of DERs has not been assessed. This study considered areas with contrasting spatial extents to assess the impact of nonergodic approaches in the seismic risk assessments of DERs. Specifically, we investigated the risk of power outages in residential communities that have access to DERs and are exposed to a significant seismic hazard. The results indicate significant differences in the estimated risk (as much as 0.2 on a scale of 0–1) between ergodic and nonergodic estimates at locations where large intensity measures and significant repeatable effects are observed. Furthermore, the nonergodic approach is better equipped to capture the spatial variation of risk estimates across a large spatial extent, but more data are required to fully realize the potential of nonergodic approaches in community-scale regions.
    • Download: (5.291Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Impact of Ergodic and Nonergodic Ground Motion Estimation on the Earthquake Resilience of Shared Distributed Energy Resource Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297189
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChenying Liu
    contributor authorJorge Macedo
    contributor authorAlbert Kottke
    contributor authorLuis Ceferino
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:39:32Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:39:32Z
    date issued2024/03/01
    identifier other10.1061-AJRUA6.RUENG-1163.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297189
    description abstractDistributed energy resource systems (DERs), such as rooftop solar panels, are gaining traction in the energy sector to improve infrastructure resilience to earthquakes by facilitating electricity sharing in seismic regions (e.g., California). The seismic risk assessment of DERs requires estimating ground motion intensity measures (IMs) using ground motion models (GMMs). In this context, a few existing efforts have used ergodic GMMs, which assume that the distribution of IMs over time (across multiple events) at a single site is the same as that of ground motion IMs over space (across multiple sites). However, with the advent of large ground motion databases, it has become evident that ground motions are influenced by location-specific repeatable effects, motivating a gradual transition into nonergodic approaches that can capture these effects. However, the impact of these approaches (i.e., ergodic and nonergodic) on the seismic risk assessment of DERs has not been assessed. This study considered areas with contrasting spatial extents to assess the impact of nonergodic approaches in the seismic risk assessments of DERs. Specifically, we investigated the risk of power outages in residential communities that have access to DERs and are exposed to a significant seismic hazard. The results indicate significant differences in the estimated risk (as much as 0.2 on a scale of 0–1) between ergodic and nonergodic estimates at locations where large intensity measures and significant repeatable effects are observed. Furthermore, the nonergodic approach is better equipped to capture the spatial variation of risk estimates across a large spatial extent, but more data are required to fully realize the potential of nonergodic approaches in community-scale regions.
    publisherASCE
    titleImpact of Ergodic and Nonergodic Ground Motion Estimation on the Earthquake Resilience of Shared Distributed Energy Resource Systems
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume10
    journal issue1
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1163
    journal fristpage04023061-1
    journal lastpage04023061-17
    page17
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian