Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Content Into Bioengineering Curricula: A Program-Level ApproachSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 005::page 51002-1Author:Mollica, Molly Y.
,
Olszewski, Emily
,
Kiyohara, Casey L.
,
Matusalem, Danafe D.
,
Ochs, Alexander R.
,
Imoukhuede, Princess I.
,
Regnier, Michael
,
Yasuhara, Ken
,
Thomas, Wendy E.
,
Taylor, Alyssa C.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4063819Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are interconnected with bioengineering, yet have historically been absent from accreditation standards and curricula. Toward educating DEI-competent bioengineers and meeting evolving accreditation requirements, we took a program-level approach to incorporate, catalog, and assess DEI content through the bioengineering undergraduate program. To support instructors in adding DEI content and inclusive pedagogy, our team developed a DEI planning worksheet and surveyed instructors pre- and post-course. Over the academic year, 74% of instructors provided a pre-term and/or post-term response. Of responding instructors, 91% described at least one DEI curricular content improvement, and 88% incorporated at least one new inclusive pedagogical approach. Based on the curricular adjustments reported by instructors, we grouped the bioengineering-related DEI content into five DEI competency categories: bioethics, inclusive design, inclusive scholarship, inclusive professionalism, and systemic inequality. To assess the DEI content incorporation, we employed direct assessment via course assignments, end-of-module student surveys, end-of-term course evaluations, and an end-of-year program review. When asked how much their experience in the program helped them develop specific DEI competencies, students reported a relatively high average of 3.79 (scale of 1 = “not at all” to 5 = “very much”). Additionally, based on student performance in course assignments and other student feedback, we found that instructors were able to effectively incorporate DEI content into a wide variety of courses. We offer this framework and lessons learned to be adopted by programs similarly motivated to train DEI-competent engineering professionals and provide an equitable, inclusive engineering education for all students.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Mollica, Molly Y. | |
| contributor author | Olszewski, Emily | |
| contributor author | Kiyohara, Casey L. | |
| contributor author | Matusalem, Danafe D. | |
| contributor author | Ochs, Alexander R. | |
| contributor author | Imoukhuede, Princess I. | |
| contributor author | Regnier, Michael | |
| contributor author | Yasuhara, Ken | |
| contributor author | Thomas, Wendy E. | |
| contributor author | Taylor, Alyssa C. | |
| date accessioned | 2024-04-24T22:34:19Z | |
| date available | 2024-04-24T22:34:19Z | |
| date copyright | 3/7/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2024 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | bio_146_05_051002.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295464 | |
| description abstract | Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are interconnected with bioengineering, yet have historically been absent from accreditation standards and curricula. Toward educating DEI-competent bioengineers and meeting evolving accreditation requirements, we took a program-level approach to incorporate, catalog, and assess DEI content through the bioengineering undergraduate program. To support instructors in adding DEI content and inclusive pedagogy, our team developed a DEI planning worksheet and surveyed instructors pre- and post-course. Over the academic year, 74% of instructors provided a pre-term and/or post-term response. Of responding instructors, 91% described at least one DEI curricular content improvement, and 88% incorporated at least one new inclusive pedagogical approach. Based on the curricular adjustments reported by instructors, we grouped the bioengineering-related DEI content into five DEI competency categories: bioethics, inclusive design, inclusive scholarship, inclusive professionalism, and systemic inequality. To assess the DEI content incorporation, we employed direct assessment via course assignments, end-of-module student surveys, end-of-term course evaluations, and an end-of-year program review. When asked how much their experience in the program helped them develop specific DEI competencies, students reported a relatively high average of 3.79 (scale of 1 = “not at all” to 5 = “very much”). Additionally, based on student performance in course assignments and other student feedback, we found that instructors were able to effectively incorporate DEI content into a wide variety of courses. We offer this framework and lessons learned to be adopted by programs similarly motivated to train DEI-competent engineering professionals and provide an equitable, inclusive engineering education for all students. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Content Into Bioengineering Curricula: A Program-Level Approach | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 146 | |
| journal issue | 5 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4063819 | |
| journal fristpage | 51002-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 51002-11 | |
| page | 11 | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 005 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |