Improving Three-Dimensional Synthetic Jet Modeling in a CrossflowSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 003::page 31302-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4064185Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Three different circular synthetic jet modeling inlet conditions are studied for a turbulent crossflow. The study examines the differences when modeling the whole synthetic jet actuators (SJA), neck-only or jet-slot-only under constant actuation frequency (f = 300 Hz), and crossflow blowing ratio (CB = 0.67). Phase-averaged and time-averaged results reveal that both whole SJA and neck-only methods generated nearly identical flow fields. For the neck-only case, a notable reduction in computational cost is achieved through the implementation of an analytical jet profile. The jet-slot-only method, on the other hand, introduces reversed flow during the ingestion cycle, leading to the injection of false-momentum into the crossflow. However, the false-momentum primarily affects the flow immediately downstream of the jet exit, with the boundary layer profile recovering rapidly. A parametric study highlights the importance of maintaining a volume ratio less than 1 of ingested to modeled neck volume to prevent the creation of false-momentum.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Ho, Howard Haonan | |
| contributor author | Essel, Ebenezer Ekow | |
| contributor author | Sullivan, Pierre Edward | |
| date accessioned | 2024-04-24T22:22:56Z | |
| date available | 2024-04-24T22:22:56Z | |
| date copyright | 1/8/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2024 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | fe_146_03_031302.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295112 | |
| description abstract | Three different circular synthetic jet modeling inlet conditions are studied for a turbulent crossflow. The study examines the differences when modeling the whole synthetic jet actuators (SJA), neck-only or jet-slot-only under constant actuation frequency (f = 300 Hz), and crossflow blowing ratio (CB = 0.67). Phase-averaged and time-averaged results reveal that both whole SJA and neck-only methods generated nearly identical flow fields. For the neck-only case, a notable reduction in computational cost is achieved through the implementation of an analytical jet profile. The jet-slot-only method, on the other hand, introduces reversed flow during the ingestion cycle, leading to the injection of false-momentum into the crossflow. However, the false-momentum primarily affects the flow immediately downstream of the jet exit, with the boundary layer profile recovering rapidly. A parametric study highlights the importance of maintaining a volume ratio less than 1 of ingested to modeled neck volume to prevent the creation of false-momentum. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Improving Three-Dimensional Synthetic Jet Modeling in a Crossflow | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 146 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4064185 | |
| journal fristpage | 31302-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 31302-12 | |
| page | 12 | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |