YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Laboratory Testing of Construction-Induced Ground Displacements for Open Caisson Shafts in Sand

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 010::page 04023086-1
    Author:
    Geyang Song
    ,
    Brian B. Sheil
    DOI: 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11419
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The development of underground spaces inevitably poses significant risks to nearby infrastructure due to construction-induced ground displacements. While our understanding of tunnel-induced ground movements is now relatively mature, there is a distinct lack of literature on large-diameter open caisson shafts. This paper fills this gap by describing results from a small-scale laboratory study exploring soil deformation mechanisms during caisson construction in dry sand. Results from seven tests are analyzed to identify the influence of key caisson geometric properties as well as the effectiveness of external cofferdams in minimizing soil displacement. The results show that the primary mechanisms driving ground movements are a compressive ‘bearing’ front beneath the cutting face and a ‘frictional’ contribution above the cutting face. The normalized radial settlement profile is also shown to be insensitive to the normalized caisson embedment depth, and the settlement zone of influence extends up to 0.25 diameters below the caisson cutting edge. Furthermore, the presence of an external cofferdam is shown to be highly effective in reducing soil settlements. Quantitative analysis reveals a significant decrease in soil settlement with an increase in cofferdam depth from 0.25 to 0.5 of caisson depth, with good consistency between results for different soil elevations. In addition, larger cofferdam diameters provide maximum benefits in minimizing ground displacements.
    • Download: (4.446Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Laboratory Testing of Construction-Induced Ground Displacements for Open Caisson Shafts in Sand

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293582
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGeyang Song
    contributor authorBrian B. Sheil
    date accessioned2023-11-27T23:28:25Z
    date available2023-11-27T23:28:25Z
    date issued8/4/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023-08-04
    identifier otherJGGEFK.GTENG-11419.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293582
    description abstractThe development of underground spaces inevitably poses significant risks to nearby infrastructure due to construction-induced ground displacements. While our understanding of tunnel-induced ground movements is now relatively mature, there is a distinct lack of literature on large-diameter open caisson shafts. This paper fills this gap by describing results from a small-scale laboratory study exploring soil deformation mechanisms during caisson construction in dry sand. Results from seven tests are analyzed to identify the influence of key caisson geometric properties as well as the effectiveness of external cofferdams in minimizing soil displacement. The results show that the primary mechanisms driving ground movements are a compressive ‘bearing’ front beneath the cutting face and a ‘frictional’ contribution above the cutting face. The normalized radial settlement profile is also shown to be insensitive to the normalized caisson embedment depth, and the settlement zone of influence extends up to 0.25 diameters below the caisson cutting edge. Furthermore, the presence of an external cofferdam is shown to be highly effective in reducing soil settlements. Quantitative analysis reveals a significant decrease in soil settlement with an increase in cofferdam depth from 0.25 to 0.5 of caisson depth, with good consistency between results for different soil elevations. In addition, larger cofferdam diameters provide maximum benefits in minimizing ground displacements.
    publisherASCE
    titleLaboratory Testing of Construction-Induced Ground Displacements for Open Caisson Shafts in Sand
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume149
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11419
    journal fristpage04023086-1
    journal lastpage04023086-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian