YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    True Liquefaction Triggering Curve

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 003::page 04023005-1
    Author:
    Sneha Upadhyaya
    ,
    Russell A. Green
    ,
    Adrian Rodriguez-Marek
    ,
    Brett W. Maurer
    DOI: 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11126
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Current simplified models for predicting liquefaction triggering and manifestation do not account for the mechanisms of liquefaction triggering and surface manifestation in a consistent and sufficient manner. Specifically, an artifact of the way simplified triggering curves have traditionally been developed is that they inherently include some factors that influence surface manifestations, particularly for medium-dense to dense soils. As a result, using the simplified triggering curves in conjunction with the manifestation models results in the double-counting, omission, or general obscuration of distinct factors that influence triggering and manifestation. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to develop a framework for deriving a true simplified liquefaction triggering model consistent with a defined manifestation model, such that factors influential to triggering and manifestation are handled more rationally and consistently. Operating in conjunction with the LSNish manifestation model, the performance of the true triggering curve is compared with an existing, popular triggering curve using a set of 50 global case histories; the results are favorable for the proposed framework. Furthermore, the ability of the true liquefaction model to be used in conjunction with manifestation models that account for complex free-field soil profile stratigraphies or developed sites is a significant advantage over traditionally developed triggering models.
    • Download: (1001.Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      True Liquefaction Triggering Curve

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292728
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSneha Upadhyaya
    contributor authorRussell A. Green
    contributor authorAdrian Rodriguez-Marek
    contributor authorBrett W. Maurer
    date accessioned2023-08-16T19:04:55Z
    date available2023-08-16T19:04:55Z
    date issued2023/03/01
    identifier otherJGGEFK.GTENG-11126.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292728
    description abstractCurrent simplified models for predicting liquefaction triggering and manifestation do not account for the mechanisms of liquefaction triggering and surface manifestation in a consistent and sufficient manner. Specifically, an artifact of the way simplified triggering curves have traditionally been developed is that they inherently include some factors that influence surface manifestations, particularly for medium-dense to dense soils. As a result, using the simplified triggering curves in conjunction with the manifestation models results in the double-counting, omission, or general obscuration of distinct factors that influence triggering and manifestation. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to develop a framework for deriving a true simplified liquefaction triggering model consistent with a defined manifestation model, such that factors influential to triggering and manifestation are handled more rationally and consistently. Operating in conjunction with the LSNish manifestation model, the performance of the true triggering curve is compared with an existing, popular triggering curve using a set of 50 global case histories; the results are favorable for the proposed framework. Furthermore, the ability of the true liquefaction model to be used in conjunction with manifestation models that account for complex free-field soil profile stratigraphies or developed sites is a significant advantage over traditionally developed triggering models.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleTrue Liquefaction Triggering Curve
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume149
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11126
    journal fristpage04023005-1
    journal lastpage04023005-16
    page16
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian