Design and Analysis of Multifidelity Finite Element SimulationsSource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 006::page 61703-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4056874Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The numerical accuracy of finite element analysis (FEA) depends on the number of finite elements used in the discretization of the space, which can be varied using the mesh size. The larger the number of elements, the more accurate the results are. However, the computational cost increases with the number of elements. In current practice, the experimenter chooses a mesh size that is expected to produce a reasonably accurate result, and for which the computer simulation can be completed in a reasonable amount of time. Improvements to this approach have been proposed using multifidelity modeling by choosing two or three mesh sizes. However, mesh size is a continuous parameter, and therefore, multifidelity simulations can be performed easily by choosing a different value for the mesh size for each of the simulations. In this article, we develop a method to optimally find the mesh sizes for each simulation and satisfy the same time constraints as a single or a double mesh size experiment. A range of different mesh sizes used in the proposed method allows one to fit multifidelity models more reliably and predict the outcome when meshes approach infinitesimally small, which is impossible to achieve in actual simulations. We illustrate our approach using an analytical function and a cantilever beam finite element analysis experiment.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Shaowu Yuchi, Henry | |
contributor author | Roshan Joseph, V. | |
contributor author | Jeff Wu, C. F. | |
date accessioned | 2023-08-16T18:43:49Z | |
date available | 2023-08-16T18:43:49Z | |
date copyright | 3/15/2023 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2023 | |
identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
identifier other | md_145_6_061703.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292397 | |
description abstract | The numerical accuracy of finite element analysis (FEA) depends on the number of finite elements used in the discretization of the space, which can be varied using the mesh size. The larger the number of elements, the more accurate the results are. However, the computational cost increases with the number of elements. In current practice, the experimenter chooses a mesh size that is expected to produce a reasonably accurate result, and for which the computer simulation can be completed in a reasonable amount of time. Improvements to this approach have been proposed using multifidelity modeling by choosing two or three mesh sizes. However, mesh size is a continuous parameter, and therefore, multifidelity simulations can be performed easily by choosing a different value for the mesh size for each of the simulations. In this article, we develop a method to optimally find the mesh sizes for each simulation and satisfy the same time constraints as a single or a double mesh size experiment. A range of different mesh sizes used in the proposed method allows one to fit multifidelity models more reliably and predict the outcome when meshes approach infinitesimally small, which is impossible to achieve in actual simulations. We illustrate our approach using an analytical function and a cantilever beam finite element analysis experiment. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Design and Analysis of Multifidelity Finite Element Simulations | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 145 | |
journal issue | 6 | |
journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4056874 | |
journal fristpage | 61703-1 | |
journal lastpage | 61703-8 | |
page | 8 | |
tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 006 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |