YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Impact of Gender on Individual Perceptions and Team Psychological Safety in Engineering Design Teams in Education

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 003::page 32303-1
    Author:
    Cole, Courtney
    ,
    Jablokow, Kathryn
    ,
    Mohammed, Susan
    ,
    Miller, Scarlett
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4056745
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Improving team interactions in engineering to model gender inclusivity has been at the forefront of many initiatives in both academia and industry. However, there has been limited evidence on the impact of gender-diverse teams on psychological safety (PS). This is important because psychological safety has been shown to be a key facet for the development of innovative ideas, and has also been shown to be a cornerstone of effective teamwork. But how does the gender diversity of a team impact the development of psychological safety? The current study was developed to explore just this through an empirical study with 38 engineering design student teams over the course of an eight-week design project. These teams were designed to be half heterogeneous (either half-men and half-women, or majority men) or other half homogeneous (all men). We captured psychological safety at five time points between the homogeneous and heterogeneous teams and also explored individual dichotomous (peer-review) ratings of psychological safety at the end of the project. Results indicated that there was no difference in psychological safety between gender homogeneous and heterogeneous teams. However, women perceived themselves as more psychologically safe with other team members who identified as women in comparison to their ratings of team members that identified as men. Women also perceived themselves to be less psychologically safe with men than men felt toward team members that identify as a woman. While males did not experience any significant differences in their perceptions of psychological safety toward any gender, the results from the perspective of women still indicate a discrepancy in perceptions between genders. These results point to the need to further explore the role of minoritized groups in psychological safety research and to explore how this effect presents itself (or is covered up) at the team level, as well as investigate impacts on all-women teams.
    • Download: (364.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Impact of Gender on Individual Perceptions and Team Psychological Safety in Engineering Design Teams in Education

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292361
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCole, Courtney
    contributor authorJablokow, Kathryn
    contributor authorMohammed, Susan
    contributor authorMiller, Scarlett
    date accessioned2023-08-16T18:42:41Z
    date available2023-08-16T18:42:41Z
    date copyright2/7/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_145_3_032303.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292361
    description abstractImproving team interactions in engineering to model gender inclusivity has been at the forefront of many initiatives in both academia and industry. However, there has been limited evidence on the impact of gender-diverse teams on psychological safety (PS). This is important because psychological safety has been shown to be a key facet for the development of innovative ideas, and has also been shown to be a cornerstone of effective teamwork. But how does the gender diversity of a team impact the development of psychological safety? The current study was developed to explore just this through an empirical study with 38 engineering design student teams over the course of an eight-week design project. These teams were designed to be half heterogeneous (either half-men and half-women, or majority men) or other half homogeneous (all men). We captured psychological safety at five time points between the homogeneous and heterogeneous teams and also explored individual dichotomous (peer-review) ratings of psychological safety at the end of the project. Results indicated that there was no difference in psychological safety between gender homogeneous and heterogeneous teams. However, women perceived themselves as more psychologically safe with other team members who identified as women in comparison to their ratings of team members that identified as men. Women also perceived themselves to be less psychologically safe with men than men felt toward team members that identify as a woman. While males did not experience any significant differences in their perceptions of psychological safety toward any gender, the results from the perspective of women still indicate a discrepancy in perceptions between genders. These results point to the need to further explore the role of minoritized groups in psychological safety research and to explore how this effect presents itself (or is covered up) at the team level, as well as investigate impacts on all-women teams.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Impact of Gender on Individual Perceptions and Team Psychological Safety in Engineering Design Teams in Education
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume145
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4056745
    journal fristpage32303-1
    journal lastpage32303-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian