YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Using Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques

    Source: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2022:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 001::page 11006-1
    Author:
    Schueller, Alexandra
    ,
    Saldaña, Christopher
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4055822
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Tool condition monitoring (TCM) has become a research area of interest due to its potential to significantly reduce manufacturing costs while increasing process visibility and efficiency. Machine learning (ML) is one analysis technique which has demonstrated advantages for TCM applications. However, the commonly studied individual ML models lack generalizability to new machining and environmental conditions, as well as robustness to the unbalanced datasets which are common in TCM. Ensemble ML models have demonstrated superior performance in other fields, but have only begun to be evaluated for TCM. As a result, it is not well understood how their TCM performance compares to that of individual models, or how homogeneous and heterogeneous ensemble models’ performances compare to one another. To fill in these research gaps, milling experiments were conducted using various cutting conditions, and the model groups were compared across several performance metrics. Statistical t-tests were also used to evaluate the significance of model performance differences. Through the analysis of four individual ML models and five ensemble models, all based on the processes’ sound, spindle power, and axial load signals, it was found that on average, the ensemble models performed better than the individual models, and that the homogeneous ensembles outperformed the heterogeneous ensembles.
    • Download: (767.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Indirect Tool Condition Monitoring Using Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292242
    Collections
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSchueller, Alexandra
    contributor authorSaldaña, Christopher
    date accessioned2023-08-16T18:37:55Z
    date available2023-08-16T18:37:55Z
    date copyright10/13/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn1087-1357
    identifier othermanu_145_1_011006.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292242
    description abstractTool condition monitoring (TCM) has become a research area of interest due to its potential to significantly reduce manufacturing costs while increasing process visibility and efficiency. Machine learning (ML) is one analysis technique which has demonstrated advantages for TCM applications. However, the commonly studied individual ML models lack generalizability to new machining and environmental conditions, as well as robustness to the unbalanced datasets which are common in TCM. Ensemble ML models have demonstrated superior performance in other fields, but have only begun to be evaluated for TCM. As a result, it is not well understood how their TCM performance compares to that of individual models, or how homogeneous and heterogeneous ensemble models’ performances compare to one another. To fill in these research gaps, milling experiments were conducted using various cutting conditions, and the model groups were compared across several performance metrics. Statistical t-tests were also used to evaluate the significance of model performance differences. Through the analysis of four individual ML models and five ensemble models, all based on the processes’ sound, spindle power, and axial load signals, it was found that on average, the ensemble models performed better than the individual models, and that the homogeneous ensembles outperformed the heterogeneous ensembles.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleIndirect Tool Condition Monitoring Using Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume145
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4055822
    journal fristpage11006-1
    journal lastpage11006-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2022:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian