contributor author | Schwartz, Emily K. | |
contributor author | Krarti, Moncef | |
date accessioned | 2023-08-16T18:36:18Z | |
date available | 2023-08-16T18:36:18Z | |
date copyright | 4/28/2023 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2023 | |
identifier issn | 2642-6641 | |
identifier other | jesbc_4_2_021001.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292202 | |
description abstract | In this paper, a life cycle cost-based optimization analysis is carried out to compare the energy and cost performance of diverse sustainable designs of a residential building. These designs include code optimal, net zero energy building, and passive house. It is found that in the case where natural gas is employed, a total energy savings of 77% is optimal. The cost-optimal design for electrification achieves 100.12% of energy savings relative to the baseline design but results in a slightly high life cycle cost than that of the gas-cost optimal design. In addition, the results indicate that due to the additional capital costs for the required energy-efficient measures, the passive house case is less economically optimal than the Net Zero Energy Building design options. Overall, the most cost-optimal designs are found to be for natural gas-heated homes with marginally better energy performance than the applicable current energy efficiency code with 10-kW solar panels. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Comparative Analysis Optimal Designs for Passive, Electrified, and Net Zero Energy Residential Buildings | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 4 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4062325 | |
journal fristpage | 21001-1 | |
journal lastpage | 21001-14 | |
page | 14 | |
tree | ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities:;2023:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |