Analysis, Comparison, and Discussion on the Utilization of the Existing Slug Liquid Holdup Models to Predict the Horizontal Gas-Liquid Plug-to-Slug Flow TransitionSource: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 007::page 74501-1Author:Boutaghane, Ayoub
,
Arabi, Abderraouf
,
Ibrahim-Rassoul, Nouara
,
Al-sarkhi, Abdelsalam
,
Azzi, Abdelwahid
DOI: 10.1115/1.4056889Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In horizontal configuration, the gas-liquid intermittent flow can be plug flow or slug flow. Different works have demonstrated that the two flow patterns, despite their similarity, are differents. Thus, it is important to differentiate between them in order to develop more robust predictive models. The limit of the existing model to predict the plug-to-slug flow transition was demonstrated first. After that, 11 existing slug liquid holdup (HLS) models were used in order to test their potential utilization for predicting the plug-to-slug flow transition. Using HLS = 0.9 as the criterion to distinguish between the two regimes, the relationship between the superficial velocities of the two phases was generated. The obtained transition lines were compared with visual observations collected from several published works in order to test the predictions of each model, and for different operating conditions. It was concluded in this paper that the slug liquid holdup models can be easily used for this purpose. Meanwhile, the prediction level of each model depends on the pipe diameter and the viscosity of the liquid phase.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Boutaghane, Ayoub | |
contributor author | Arabi, Abderraouf | |
contributor author | Ibrahim-Rassoul, Nouara | |
contributor author | Al-sarkhi, Abdelsalam | |
contributor author | Azzi, Abdelwahid | |
date accessioned | 2023-08-16T18:35:18Z | |
date available | 2023-08-16T18:35:18Z | |
date copyright | 3/2/2023 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2023 | |
identifier issn | 0195-0738 | |
identifier other | jert_145_7_074501.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292177 | |
description abstract | In horizontal configuration, the gas-liquid intermittent flow can be plug flow or slug flow. Different works have demonstrated that the two flow patterns, despite their similarity, are differents. Thus, it is important to differentiate between them in order to develop more robust predictive models. The limit of the existing model to predict the plug-to-slug flow transition was demonstrated first. After that, 11 existing slug liquid holdup (HLS) models were used in order to test their potential utilization for predicting the plug-to-slug flow transition. Using HLS = 0.9 as the criterion to distinguish between the two regimes, the relationship between the superficial velocities of the two phases was generated. The obtained transition lines were compared with visual observations collected from several published works in order to test the predictions of each model, and for different operating conditions. It was concluded in this paper that the slug liquid holdup models can be easily used for this purpose. Meanwhile, the prediction level of each model depends on the pipe diameter and the viscosity of the liquid phase. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Analysis, Comparison, and Discussion on the Utilization of the Existing Slug Liquid Holdup Models to Predict the Horizontal Gas-Liquid Plug-to-Slug Flow Transition | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 145 | |
journal issue | 7 | |
journal title | Journal of Energy Resources Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4056889 | |
journal fristpage | 74501-1 | |
journal lastpage | 74501-8 | |
page | 8 | |
tree | Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 007 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |