Show simple item record

contributor authorBaglietto, Giovanni
contributor authorMaccarini, Simone
contributor authorTraverso, Alberto
contributor authorBruttini, Paolo
date accessioned2023-08-16T18:22:28Z
date available2023-08-16T18:22:28Z
date copyright12/14/2022 12:00:00 AM
date issued2022
identifier issn0742-4795
identifier othergtp_145_04_041021.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291872
description abstractSupercritical CO2 (sCO2) is taking a growing interest in both industry and academic communities as a promising technology capable of high efficiency, flexibility, and competitive capital costs. Many possible applications are studied in the energy field, from nuclear power plants to concentrating solar power and waste heat recovery (WHR). To evaluate the competitiveness of sCO2 cycles relative to other competing technologies, mainly steam and organic fluid Rankine cycles (ORC), a specific techno-economic analysis is needed to fairly compare the different technologies for each application, in order to find the most appropriate market position of the innovative sCO2 plants, compared to the existing steam and ORC solutions. In the present study, techno-economic analysis and optimization have been conducted focusing on WHR applications, for different sizes and cycle parameters operating conditions using an in-house simulation tool. The analyzed cycles were first optimized by aiming at maximizing the net electrical power and then aiming at minimizing the specific capital cost. As a result, compared to traditional plants, we obtained that in the first case, the more complex sCO2 cycle configuration shows competitive performance, while in the second case, the simpler sCO2 cycle configuration has a lower specific cost for the same electrical power produced (with a difference of approximately −130 €/kW compared to the steam cycle). In general, while traditional technologies confirmed a good tradeoff between performance and cost, supercritical CO2 cycles show attractive characteristics for applications requiring simplicity and compactness, guaranteeing in the meantime other technical advantages such as water-free operation.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleTechno-Economic Comparison of Supercritical CO2, Steam, and Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery Applications
typeJournal Paper
journal volume145
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4055727
journal fristpage41021-1
journal lastpage41021-13
page13
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2022:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record