YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Open Journal of Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Open Journal of Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Systematic Assessment of the Two-Step, One-Way Coupled Method for Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Source: ASME Open Journal of Engineering:;2023:;volume( 002 )::page 21020-1
    Author:
    Papafilippou, Nikolaos
    ,
    Chishty, Muhammad Aqib
    ,
    Gebart, Rikard
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4062111
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper assesses the validity of the Two-Step, One-Way (TSOW) coupled method for computational fluid dynamics, which splits a complicated geometry into an upstream and a downstream part. The problem is solved in two steps: first, the upstream part using approximate downstream boundary conditions, followed by a solution of the downstream flow where the inlet boundary conditions are extracted from the upstream solution. The method is based on two assumptions: first, the solution for the upstream part should be identical in the common domain to a complete solution. Second, the solution for the downstream part should be identical in the common domain to a complete solution. The resulting agreement between the upstream solution and the full solution was excellent, except in the vicinity of the outflow boundary. For the assessment of the second assumption, the downstream flow was simulated with two sets of boundary conditions, one that was extracted from the full simulation, and one that came from the upstream part solution. The two solutions in the downstream geometry with slightly different boundary conditions agreed excellently with each other but exhibited small differences from the full solution. Overall, the difference to the full solution is judged to be acceptable for many engineering design situations. The solution time for the TSOW method was about 23 h faster than the full solution, which took about 85 h on the same hardware. For additional design iterations, where the same upstream geometry can be used, a 30-h gain would be obtained for each step.
    • Download: (977.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Systematic Assessment of the Two-Step, One-Way Coupled Method for Computational Fluid Dynamics

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291867
    Collections
    • ASME Open Journal of Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPapafilippou, Nikolaos
    contributor authorChishty, Muhammad Aqib
    contributor authorGebart, Rikard
    date accessioned2023-08-16T18:22:20Z
    date available2023-08-16T18:22:20Z
    date copyright3/30/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023
    identifier issn2770-3495
    identifier otheraoje_2_021020.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291867
    description abstractThis paper assesses the validity of the Two-Step, One-Way (TSOW) coupled method for computational fluid dynamics, which splits a complicated geometry into an upstream and a downstream part. The problem is solved in two steps: first, the upstream part using approximate downstream boundary conditions, followed by a solution of the downstream flow where the inlet boundary conditions are extracted from the upstream solution. The method is based on two assumptions: first, the solution for the upstream part should be identical in the common domain to a complete solution. Second, the solution for the downstream part should be identical in the common domain to a complete solution. The resulting agreement between the upstream solution and the full solution was excellent, except in the vicinity of the outflow boundary. For the assessment of the second assumption, the downstream flow was simulated with two sets of boundary conditions, one that was extracted from the full simulation, and one that came from the upstream part solution. The two solutions in the downstream geometry with slightly different boundary conditions agreed excellently with each other but exhibited small differences from the full solution. Overall, the difference to the full solution is judged to be acceptable for many engineering design situations. The solution time for the TSOW method was about 23 h faster than the full solution, which took about 85 h on the same hardware. For additional design iterations, where the same upstream geometry can be used, a 30-h gain would be obtained for each step.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleSystematic Assessment of the Two-Step, One-Way Coupled Method for Computational Fluid Dynamics
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume2
    journal titleASME Open Journal of Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4062111
    journal fristpage21020-1
    journal lastpage21020-11
    page11
    treeASME Open Journal of Engineering:;2023:;volume( 002 )
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian