Workflow Comparison for Combined 4D MRI/CFD Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Flow Simulations of the Thoracic AortaSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 006::page 61106-1Author:Tajeddini, Farshad
,
Romero, David A.
,
McClarty, Davis
,
Chung, Jennifer
,
Amon, Cristina H.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4057047Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to predict and understand cardiovascular flows. However, the accuracy of CFD predictions depends on faithful reconstruction of patient vascular anatomy and accurate patient-specific inlet and outlet boundary conditions. 4-Dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D MRI) can provide patient-specific data to obtain the required geometry and time-dependent flow boundary conditions for CFD simulations, and can further be used to validate CFD predictions. This work presents a framework to combine both spatiotemporal 4D MRI data and patient monitoring data with CFD simulation workflows. To assist practitioners, all aspects of the modeling workflow, from geometry reconstruction to results postprocessing, are illustrated and compared using three software packages (ansys, comsol, SimVascular) to predict hemodynamics in the thoracic aorta. A sensitivity analysis with respect to inlet boundary condition is presented. Results highlight the importance of 4D MRI data for improving the accuracy of flow predictions on the ascending aorta and the aortic arch. In contrast, simulation results for the descending aorta are less sensitive to the patient-specific inlet boundary conditions.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Tajeddini, Farshad | |
| contributor author | Romero, David A. | |
| contributor author | McClarty, Davis | |
| contributor author | Chung, Jennifer | |
| contributor author | Amon, Cristina H. | |
| date accessioned | 2023-08-16T18:17:44Z | |
| date available | 2023-08-16T18:17:44Z | |
| date copyright | 3/24/2023 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2023 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | fe_145_06_061106.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291782 | |
| description abstract | Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to predict and understand cardiovascular flows. However, the accuracy of CFD predictions depends on faithful reconstruction of patient vascular anatomy and accurate patient-specific inlet and outlet boundary conditions. 4-Dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D MRI) can provide patient-specific data to obtain the required geometry and time-dependent flow boundary conditions for CFD simulations, and can further be used to validate CFD predictions. This work presents a framework to combine both spatiotemporal 4D MRI data and patient monitoring data with CFD simulation workflows. To assist practitioners, all aspects of the modeling workflow, from geometry reconstruction to results postprocessing, are illustrated and compared using three software packages (ansys, comsol, SimVascular) to predict hemodynamics in the thoracic aorta. A sensitivity analysis with respect to inlet boundary condition is presented. Results highlight the importance of 4D MRI data for improving the accuracy of flow predictions on the ascending aorta and the aortic arch. In contrast, simulation results for the descending aorta are less sensitive to the patient-specific inlet boundary conditions. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Workflow Comparison for Combined 4D MRI/CFD Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Flow Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 145 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4057047 | |
| journal fristpage | 61106-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 61106-11 | |
| page | 11 | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |