YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Workflow Comparison for Combined 4D MRI/CFD Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Flow Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 006::page 61106-1
    Author:
    Tajeddini, Farshad
    ,
    Romero, David A.
    ,
    McClarty, Davis
    ,
    Chung, Jennifer
    ,
    Amon, Cristina H.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4057047
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to predict and understand cardiovascular flows. However, the accuracy of CFD predictions depends on faithful reconstruction of patient vascular anatomy and accurate patient-specific inlet and outlet boundary conditions. 4-Dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D MRI) can provide patient-specific data to obtain the required geometry and time-dependent flow boundary conditions for CFD simulations, and can further be used to validate CFD predictions. This work presents a framework to combine both spatiotemporal 4D MRI data and patient monitoring data with CFD simulation workflows. To assist practitioners, all aspects of the modeling workflow, from geometry reconstruction to results postprocessing, are illustrated and compared using three software packages (ansys, comsol, SimVascular) to predict hemodynamics in the thoracic aorta. A sensitivity analysis with respect to inlet boundary condition is presented. Results highlight the importance of 4D MRI data for improving the accuracy of flow predictions on the ascending aorta and the aortic arch. In contrast, simulation results for the descending aorta are less sensitive to the patient-specific inlet boundary conditions.
    • Download: (7.203Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Workflow Comparison for Combined 4D MRI/CFD Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Flow Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291782
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTajeddini, Farshad
    contributor authorRomero, David A.
    contributor authorMcClarty, Davis
    contributor authorChung, Jennifer
    contributor authorAmon, Cristina H.
    date accessioned2023-08-16T18:17:44Z
    date available2023-08-16T18:17:44Z
    date copyright3/24/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_145_06_061106.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291782
    description abstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to predict and understand cardiovascular flows. However, the accuracy of CFD predictions depends on faithful reconstruction of patient vascular anatomy and accurate patient-specific inlet and outlet boundary conditions. 4-Dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D MRI) can provide patient-specific data to obtain the required geometry and time-dependent flow boundary conditions for CFD simulations, and can further be used to validate CFD predictions. This work presents a framework to combine both spatiotemporal 4D MRI data and patient monitoring data with CFD simulation workflows. To assist practitioners, all aspects of the modeling workflow, from geometry reconstruction to results postprocessing, are illustrated and compared using three software packages (ansys, comsol, SimVascular) to predict hemodynamics in the thoracic aorta. A sensitivity analysis with respect to inlet boundary condition is presented. Results highlight the importance of 4D MRI data for improving the accuracy of flow predictions on the ascending aorta and the aortic arch. In contrast, simulation results for the descending aorta are less sensitive to the patient-specific inlet boundary conditions.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleWorkflow Comparison for Combined 4D MRI/CFD Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Flow Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume145
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4057047
    journal fristpage61106-1
    journal lastpage61106-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian