YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Influence of Interpolation Scheme on the Accuracy of Overset Method for Computing Rudder-Propeller Interaction

    Source: Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2023:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 001::page 11002-1
    Author:
    Lemaire, Sébastien
    ,
    Vaz, Guilherme
    ,
    van Rijswijk, Menno Deij -
    ,
    Turnock, Stephen R.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4056681
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The overset method and associated interpolation schemes are usually thoroughly verified only on synthetic or academic test cases for which conclusions might not directly translate to real engineering problems. In the present work, an overset grid method is used to simulate a rudder-propeller flow, for which a comprehensive verification and validation study is performed. Three overset-related interpolation schemes (first order inverse distance, second order nearest cell gradient and third order least squares) are tested to quantify and qualify numerical errors on integral quantities, mass imbalance, flow features and rudder pressure distributions. The performance overhead is also measured to help make accuracy versus performance balance decisions. Rigorous solution verification is performed to estimate time and space Discretization, iterative and statistical uncertainties. Validation of the propeller-rudder flow against experimental data is also done. The results show that, while the choice of interpolation scheme has minimal impact on time-averaged integral quantities (like propeller and rudder forces), they do influence the smoothness of the time signals, with the first order scheme resulting in large intensity high-frequency temporal oscillations. Lower order interpolation methods also produce more interpolation artifacts in fringe cells, which are then convected downstream. Mass imbalance is also affected by the interpolation scheme, with higher order schemes such as the third order least squares approach resulting in an order of magnitude lower flux errors. The limitations of first order schemes do not, however, result in significant lower computational overhead, with the second order nearest cell gradient being even cheaper than the inverse distance scheme in the tested implementation. Lastly, validation shows promising results with rudder forces within 10% of the experiments.
    • Download: (7.533Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Influence of Interpolation Scheme on the Accuracy of Overset Method for Computing Rudder-Propeller Interaction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291643
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLemaire, Sébastien
    contributor authorVaz, Guilherme
    contributor authorvan Rijswijk, Menno Deij -
    contributor authorTurnock, Stephen R.
    date accessioned2023-08-16T18:13:07Z
    date available2023-08-16T18:13:07Z
    date copyright1/27/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023
    identifier issn2377-2158
    identifier othervvuq_008_01_011002.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291643
    description abstractThe overset method and associated interpolation schemes are usually thoroughly verified only on synthetic or academic test cases for which conclusions might not directly translate to real engineering problems. In the present work, an overset grid method is used to simulate a rudder-propeller flow, for which a comprehensive verification and validation study is performed. Three overset-related interpolation schemes (first order inverse distance, second order nearest cell gradient and third order least squares) are tested to quantify and qualify numerical errors on integral quantities, mass imbalance, flow features and rudder pressure distributions. The performance overhead is also measured to help make accuracy versus performance balance decisions. Rigorous solution verification is performed to estimate time and space Discretization, iterative and statistical uncertainties. Validation of the propeller-rudder flow against experimental data is also done. The results show that, while the choice of interpolation scheme has minimal impact on time-averaged integral quantities (like propeller and rudder forces), they do influence the smoothness of the time signals, with the first order scheme resulting in large intensity high-frequency temporal oscillations. Lower order interpolation methods also produce more interpolation artifacts in fringe cells, which are then convected downstream. Mass imbalance is also affected by the interpolation scheme, with higher order schemes such as the third order least squares approach resulting in an order of magnitude lower flux errors. The limitations of first order schemes do not, however, result in significant lower computational overhead, with the second order nearest cell gradient being even cheaper than the inverse distance scheme in the tested implementation. Lastly, validation shows promising results with rudder forces within 10% of the experiments.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleInfluence of Interpolation Scheme on the Accuracy of Overset Method for Computing Rudder-Propeller Interaction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume8
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4056681
    journal fristpage11002-1
    journal lastpage11002-17
    page17
    treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2023:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian