Show simple item record

contributor authorGuo, Pengyan
contributor authorCheng, Wen
contributor authorChong, Perk Lin
contributor authorXia, Bin
contributor authorYang, Aolei
contributor authorZeng, Xinhao
date accessioned2023-08-16T18:06:53Z
date available2023-08-16T18:06:53Z
date copyright2/10/2023 12:00:00 AM
date issued2023
identifier issn1948-5085
identifier othertsea_15_4_041004.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291435
description abstractWith the continuous development of internal combustion engine technology, the thermal efficiency of traditional energy vehicles has been difficult to improve, and the heat loss caused by high-temperature exhaust emissions is an important reason for the low thermal efficiency. To utilize the exhaust heat, the aim is to develop various spiral tube heat exchanger designs, namely, constant curvature heat exchanger with baffle and variable curvature heat exchanger. The design has been evaluated by referring to the performance evaluation coefficient (PEC); furthermore, the convection coefficient h has been taken into consideration as well. The idea is to perform numerical studies via computational fluid dynamics package and evaluate the performance of the spiral tube heat exchanger designs. PEC is the relationship between the heat exchange intensity of the heat exchanger and the flow resistance of the working fluid. The results show that the PEC evaluation index of the heat exchanger is the best when the spiral diameter of the heat exchange tube is 120 mm, and with the increase of the tube diameter and pitch, the overall performance of the heat exchanger decreases. The research on heat transfer enhancement of heat exchangers was carried out, and various spiral tube heat exchangers were designed based on the structure of spiral heat exchange tubes. The variable curvature heat exchanger has better overall performance than the baffle constant curvature heat exchanger. Compared to the single-variable curvature and the double-variable curvature, the maximum PEC difference of them does not exceed 0.01, and the double-variable curvature is more sufficient in volume utilization, and it can save about 13% volume. Considering the use requirements of the actual vehicle waste heat recovery system, the double-variable curvature spiral tube heat exchanger is more suitable for practical engineering applications than the single-variable curvature spiral tube heat exchanger.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComputational Fluid Dynamics Study on Exhaust Heat Recovery of Various Spiral Tube Heat Exchangers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume15
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
identifier doi10.1115/1.4056676
journal fristpage41004-1
journal lastpage41004-13
page13
treeJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2023:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record