YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Benchmarking of Gaussian Process Regression with Multiple Random Fields for Spatial Variability Estimation

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 004::page 04022052
    Author:
    Yukihisa Tomizawa
    ,
    Ikumasa Yoshida
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001277
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Benchmarking is very valuable for evaluating and comparing methodologies. Here, Gaussian process regression using multiple Gaussian random fields (GPR-MR) is applied to benchmarking data for spatial variability problems. The benchmarking data used were from the literature and included four types of virtual ground models (VG1 to VG4) and one real ground measurement data set. The spatial variability of geological properties is often divided into a trend component and a random component. In GPR-MR, the trend component is expressed by a random field with a large scale of fluctuation (SOF), leading to a smooth (slow) variability, whereas the random component is expressed by one with a small SOF, leading to a rapidly changing variability. The SOF and the standard deviation of random fields were estimated using the maximum likelihood method based on the measured data provided in the benchmarking data. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variabilities of all cases, and its performance was evaluated. For the real ground measured data, model selection was also performed with respect to the autocorrelation function of the random component in terms of information criteria, whereas the Markovian autocorrelation function was used for the virtual ground data without the model selection. Based on the results, the Whittle-Matérn (WM) model was selected for the random component. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variability, and its performance with the WM model was evaluated.
    • Download: (3.491Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Benchmarking of Gaussian Process Regression with Multiple Random Fields for Spatial Variability Estimation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289454
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYukihisa Tomizawa
    contributor authorIkumasa Yoshida
    date accessioned2023-04-07T00:38:31Z
    date available2023-04-07T00:38:31Z
    date issued2022/12/01
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0001277.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289454
    description abstractBenchmarking is very valuable for evaluating and comparing methodologies. Here, Gaussian process regression using multiple Gaussian random fields (GPR-MR) is applied to benchmarking data for spatial variability problems. The benchmarking data used were from the literature and included four types of virtual ground models (VG1 to VG4) and one real ground measurement data set. The spatial variability of geological properties is often divided into a trend component and a random component. In GPR-MR, the trend component is expressed by a random field with a large scale of fluctuation (SOF), leading to a smooth (slow) variability, whereas the random component is expressed by one with a small SOF, leading to a rapidly changing variability. The SOF and the standard deviation of random fields were estimated using the maximum likelihood method based on the measured data provided in the benchmarking data. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variabilities of all cases, and its performance was evaluated. For the real ground measured data, model selection was also performed with respect to the autocorrelation function of the random component in terms of information criteria, whereas the Markovian autocorrelation function was used for the virtual ground data without the model selection. Based on the results, the Whittle-Matérn (WM) model was selected for the random component. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variability, and its performance with the WM model was evaluated.
    publisherASCE
    titleBenchmarking of Gaussian Process Regression with Multiple Random Fields for Spatial Variability Estimation
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume8
    journal issue4
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0001277
    journal fristpage04022052
    journal lastpage04022052_10
    page10
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian