YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Use of Combined Static and Dynamic Testing to Quantify the Participation of Particles in Stress Transmission

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 011::page 04022100
    Author:
    Deyun Liu
    ,
    Catherine O’Sullivan
    ,
    J. Antonio H. Carraro
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002902
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: A number of research studies have recognized that not all particles in a sand specimen are active in stress transmission, particularly in the case of gap-graded soils. This has implications for the use of the global void ratio (e), and variables/parameters that depend upon e, to predict the influence of the state on the mechanical behavior of gap-graded soils. This study explores the possibility of comparing the shear stiffness determined in dynamic wave propagation tests (Gdyn) with stiffness values determined in small-strain probes (Gsta) to assess the extent to which all the particles in a specimen are actively engaged in stress transmission. The idea is initially developed using three-dimensional discrete element method simulations and considering ideal specimens. The practical application of this approach is then tested in a series of drained triaxial compression tests. The numerical studies considered both specimens with continuous, linear particle size distributions as well as gap-graded soils. The results show that the ratio Gsta/Gdyn may be associated with the ratio between the bulk density calculated considering only the stress transmitting particles, ρm, and the bulk density calculated considering all particles, ρ. The ratio ρm/ρ is determined by the proportion of inactive particles, which varies with the proportion by mass of finer particles in the soil (Ffiner) for gap-graded soils. The relationship between Gsta/Gdyn(e) and Ffiner enables a qualitative assessment of the proportion of inactive particles. The corresponding experimental test results show a similar but weaker correlation between the ratio of Gsta/Gdyn and Ffiner, this weaker correlation may be attributed to the differences between the simulations and the experimental conditions. However, despite the challenges with experimental implementation, the data presented here support the idea that it may be possible to qualitatively estimate the proportion by volume/mass of inactive particles in physical samples by comparing the stiffness results of static and dynamic testing.
    • Download: (4.562Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Use of Combined Static and Dynamic Testing to Quantify the Participation of Particles in Stress Transmission

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289186
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDeyun Liu
    contributor authorCatherine O’Sullivan
    contributor authorJ. Antonio H. Carraro
    date accessioned2023-04-07T00:30:59Z
    date available2023-04-07T00:30:59Z
    date issued2022/11/01
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002902.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289186
    description abstractA number of research studies have recognized that not all particles in a sand specimen are active in stress transmission, particularly in the case of gap-graded soils. This has implications for the use of the global void ratio (e), and variables/parameters that depend upon e, to predict the influence of the state on the mechanical behavior of gap-graded soils. This study explores the possibility of comparing the shear stiffness determined in dynamic wave propagation tests (Gdyn) with stiffness values determined in small-strain probes (Gsta) to assess the extent to which all the particles in a specimen are actively engaged in stress transmission. The idea is initially developed using three-dimensional discrete element method simulations and considering ideal specimens. The practical application of this approach is then tested in a series of drained triaxial compression tests. The numerical studies considered both specimens with continuous, linear particle size distributions as well as gap-graded soils. The results show that the ratio Gsta/Gdyn may be associated with the ratio between the bulk density calculated considering only the stress transmitting particles, ρm, and the bulk density calculated considering all particles, ρ. The ratio ρm/ρ is determined by the proportion of inactive particles, which varies with the proportion by mass of finer particles in the soil (Ffiner) for gap-graded soils. The relationship between Gsta/Gdyn(e) and Ffiner enables a qualitative assessment of the proportion of inactive particles. The corresponding experimental test results show a similar but weaker correlation between the ratio of Gsta/Gdyn and Ffiner, this weaker correlation may be attributed to the differences between the simulations and the experimental conditions. However, despite the challenges with experimental implementation, the data presented here support the idea that it may be possible to qualitatively estimate the proportion by volume/mass of inactive particles in physical samples by comparing the stiffness results of static and dynamic testing.
    publisherASCE
    titleUse of Combined Static and Dynamic Testing to Quantify the Participation of Particles in Stress Transmission
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume148
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002902
    journal fristpage04022100
    journal lastpage04022100_17
    page17
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian