YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Monotonic Gaussian Process for PhysicsConstrained Machine Learning With Materials Science Applications

    Source: Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2022:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 001::page 11011
    Author:
    Tran, Anh;Maupin, Kathryn;Rodgers, Theron
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4055852
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Physicsconstrained machine learning is emerging as an important topic in the field of machine learning for physics. One of the most significant advantages of incorporating physics constraints into machine learning methods is that the resulting model requires significantly less data to train. By incorporating physical rules into the machine learning formulation itself, the predictions are expected to be physically plausible. Gaussian process (GP) is perhaps one of the most common methods in machine learning for small datasets. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of constraining a GP formulation with monotonicity on three different material datasets, where one experimental and two computational datasets are used. The monotonic GP is compared against the regular GP, where a significant reduction in the posterior variance is observed. The monotonic GP is strictly monotonic in the interpolation regime, but in the extrapolation regime, the monotonic effect starts fading away as one goes beyond the training dataset. Imposing monotonicity on the GP comes at a small accuracy cost, compared to the regular GP. The monotonic GP is perhaps most useful in applications where data are scarce and noisy, and monotonicity is supported by strong physical evidence.
    • Download: (1.248Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Monotonic Gaussian Process for PhysicsConstrained Machine Learning With Materials Science Applications

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288701
    Collections
    • Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTran, Anh;Maupin, Kathryn;Rodgers, Theron
    date accessioned2023-04-06T12:53:13Z
    date available2023-04-06T12:53:13Z
    date copyright10/20/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn15309827
    identifier otherjcise_23_1_011011.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288701
    description abstractPhysicsconstrained machine learning is emerging as an important topic in the field of machine learning for physics. One of the most significant advantages of incorporating physics constraints into machine learning methods is that the resulting model requires significantly less data to train. By incorporating physical rules into the machine learning formulation itself, the predictions are expected to be physically plausible. Gaussian process (GP) is perhaps one of the most common methods in machine learning for small datasets. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of constraining a GP formulation with monotonicity on three different material datasets, where one experimental and two computational datasets are used. The monotonic GP is compared against the regular GP, where a significant reduction in the posterior variance is observed. The monotonic GP is strictly monotonic in the interpolation regime, but in the extrapolation regime, the monotonic effect starts fading away as one goes beyond the training dataset. Imposing monotonicity on the GP comes at a small accuracy cost, compared to the regular GP. The monotonic GP is perhaps most useful in applications where data are scarce and noisy, and monotonicity is supported by strong physical evidence.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMonotonic Gaussian Process for PhysicsConstrained Machine Learning With Materials Science Applications
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4055852
    journal fristpage11011
    journal lastpage1101110
    page10
    treeJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2022:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian