YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    RealTime Trajectory Planning for Automated Vehicle Safety and Performance in Dynamic Environments

    Source: Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems:;2021:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004::page 41001
    Author:
    Febbo, Huckleberry;Jayakumar, Paramsothy;Stein, Jeffrey L.;Ersal, Tulga
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4053243
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Safe trajectory planning for highperformance automated vehicles in an environment with both static and moving obstacles is a challenging problem. Part of the challenge is developing a formulation that can be solved in realtime while including the following set of specifications: minimum timetogoal, a dynamic vehicle model, minimum control effort, both static and moving obstacle avoidance, simultaneous optimization of speed and steering, and a short execution horizon. This paper presents a nonlinear model predictive controlbased trajectory planning formulation, tailored for a large, highspeed unmanned ground vehicle, that includes the above set of specifications. The ability to solve this formulation in realtime is evaluated using NLOptControl, an opensource, directcollocationbased optimal control problem solver in conjunction with the KNITRO nonlinear programming problem solver. The formulation is tested with various sets of specifications. A parametric study relating execution horizon and obstacle speed indicates that the moving obstacle avoidance specification is not needed for safety when the planner has a small execution horizon and the obstacles are moving slowly. However, a moving obstacle avoidance specification is needed when the obstacles are moving faster, and this specification improves the overall safety without, in most cases, increasing the solvetimes. The results indicate that (i) safe trajectory planners for highperformance automated vehicles should include the entire set of specifications mentioned above, unless a static or lowspeed environment permits a less comprehensive planner and (ii) the resulting formulation can be solved in realtime.
    • Download: (926.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      RealTime Trajectory Planning for Automated Vehicle Safety and Performance in Dynamic Environments

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288676
    Collections
    • Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFebbo, Huckleberry;Jayakumar, Paramsothy;Stein, Jeffrey L.;Ersal, Tulga
    date accessioned2023-04-06T12:52:38Z
    date available2023-04-06T12:52:38Z
    date copyright12/30/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier otherjavs_1_4_041001.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288676
    description abstractSafe trajectory planning for highperformance automated vehicles in an environment with both static and moving obstacles is a challenging problem. Part of the challenge is developing a formulation that can be solved in realtime while including the following set of specifications: minimum timetogoal, a dynamic vehicle model, minimum control effort, both static and moving obstacle avoidance, simultaneous optimization of speed and steering, and a short execution horizon. This paper presents a nonlinear model predictive controlbased trajectory planning formulation, tailored for a large, highspeed unmanned ground vehicle, that includes the above set of specifications. The ability to solve this formulation in realtime is evaluated using NLOptControl, an opensource, directcollocationbased optimal control problem solver in conjunction with the KNITRO nonlinear programming problem solver. The formulation is tested with various sets of specifications. A parametric study relating execution horizon and obstacle speed indicates that the moving obstacle avoidance specification is not needed for safety when the planner has a small execution horizon and the obstacles are moving slowly. However, a moving obstacle avoidance specification is needed when the obstacles are moving faster, and this specification improves the overall safety without, in most cases, increasing the solvetimes. The results indicate that (i) safe trajectory planners for highperformance automated vehicles should include the entire set of specifications mentioned above, unless a static or lowspeed environment permits a less comprehensive planner and (ii) the resulting formulation can be solved in realtime.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleRealTime Trajectory Planning for Automated Vehicle Safety and Performance in Dynamic Environments
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume1
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4053243
    journal fristpage41001
    journal lastpage4100112
    page12
    treeJournal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems:;2021:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian