YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparative Study of Multi-Stage Approaches for Wind Farm Layout Optimization

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010::page 101302-1
    Author:
    Yang
    ,
    Puyi;Najafi
    ,
    Hamidreza
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4053869
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The wind farm layout optimization (WFLO) problem is a complex and nonconvex optimization problem. Even though many different heuristic algorithms and mathematical programming methods have been tested and discussed, there is no consensus about which algorithm is the most suitable approach for solving WFLO problems. Every algorithm presents its own advantages and disadvantages in solving different optimization problems; thus, multi-stage approaches may combine the advantages of multiple algorithms and offer superior performance. One multi-stage approach used for solving WFLO problems is to apply an algorithm in the first stage to produce an optimized layout which serves as the initial condition for a second-stage algorithm to perform further refinement. This paper presents a comparison between two types of multi-stage methods: the Heuristic-Gradient-based (H-G) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in stage 1 and a gradient-based algorithm in stage 2 and the Discrete-Continuous (D-C) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in the discrete scheme in stage 1 and an algorithm in the continuous scheme in stage 2. Annual energy production (AEP) is used as the objective function while the computational time associated with each approach is documented. Three scenarios are investigated in this paper with different complexity in the wind conditions. It was observed that the D-C models provide the optimal solutions with an average of 0.67% higher AEP and an average of 6.2% lower computational time in comparison with the H-G models. The results from this study provide a basis for selecting a proper optimization algorithm for solving WFLO problems which can lead to a significant increase in the overall annual energy production and a large reduction in computational time.
    • Download: (1.514Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparative Study of Multi-Stage Approaches for Wind Farm Layout Optimization

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287217
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYang
    contributor authorPuyi;Najafi
    contributor authorHamidreza
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:59:15Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:59:15Z
    date copyright3/7/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherjert_144_10_101302.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287217
    description abstractThe wind farm layout optimization (WFLO) problem is a complex and nonconvex optimization problem. Even though many different heuristic algorithms and mathematical programming methods have been tested and discussed, there is no consensus about which algorithm is the most suitable approach for solving WFLO problems. Every algorithm presents its own advantages and disadvantages in solving different optimization problems; thus, multi-stage approaches may combine the advantages of multiple algorithms and offer superior performance. One multi-stage approach used for solving WFLO problems is to apply an algorithm in the first stage to produce an optimized layout which serves as the initial condition for a second-stage algorithm to perform further refinement. This paper presents a comparison between two types of multi-stage methods: the Heuristic-Gradient-based (H-G) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in stage 1 and a gradient-based algorithm in stage 2 and the Discrete-Continuous (D-C) model which consists of a heuristic algorithm in the discrete scheme in stage 1 and an algorithm in the continuous scheme in stage 2. Annual energy production (AEP) is used as the objective function while the computational time associated with each approach is documented. Three scenarios are investigated in this paper with different complexity in the wind conditions. It was observed that the D-C models provide the optimal solutions with an average of 0.67% higher AEP and an average of 6.2% lower computational time in comparison with the H-G models. The results from this study provide a basis for selecting a proper optimization algorithm for solving WFLO problems which can lead to a significant increase in the overall annual energy production and a large reduction in computational time.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparative Study of Multi-Stage Approaches for Wind Farm Layout Optimization
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4053869
    journal fristpage101302-1
    journal lastpage101302-14
    page14
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian