YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Modified Best-Selection Method for Bridge Live-Load Model Development

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 003::page 04022027
    Author:
    Sasan Siavashi
    ,
    Christopher D. Eamon
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001248
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Due to the expanding availability of high-fidelity weigh-in-motion (WIM) data in recent years, various local agencies have modified bridge design and rating procedures to best reflect state-specific traffic loads. However, accurate procedures for load model revision are often accompanied by high computational cost and implementation complexity. To address this concern, a reliability-based approach is proposed for vehicular live-load model development that involves selecting an actual vehicle configuration from the WIM database to serve as the basis for the load model. The approach first determined the required live-load factor for each potential vehicle configuration such that all considered structures would meet a minimum level of reliability. Next, the set of potential models was screened by imposing a limit on the level of design or rating conservatism allowed for any individual structure. Finally, an optimal load model was selected from the remaining set based on a penalty point approach that accounted for the deviation of results for any single structure as well as the overall deviation across all structures. Relative to an ideal reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) solution, the proposed method requires low computational cost, is straightforward to implement, results in a realistic vehicle configuration for the live-load model, and provides reasonable accuracy. The method was found to be slightly superior to the existing best-selection approach for large databases, but significantly better for small databases.
    • Download: (1.187Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Modified Best-Selection Method for Bridge Live-Load Model Development

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286819
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSasan Siavashi
    contributor authorChristopher D. Eamon
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:33:53Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:33:53Z
    date issued2022/05/17
    identifier otherAJRUA6.0001248.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286819
    description abstractDue to the expanding availability of high-fidelity weigh-in-motion (WIM) data in recent years, various local agencies have modified bridge design and rating procedures to best reflect state-specific traffic loads. However, accurate procedures for load model revision are often accompanied by high computational cost and implementation complexity. To address this concern, a reliability-based approach is proposed for vehicular live-load model development that involves selecting an actual vehicle configuration from the WIM database to serve as the basis for the load model. The approach first determined the required live-load factor for each potential vehicle configuration such that all considered structures would meet a minimum level of reliability. Next, the set of potential models was screened by imposing a limit on the level of design or rating conservatism allowed for any individual structure. Finally, an optimal load model was selected from the remaining set based on a penalty point approach that accounted for the deviation of results for any single structure as well as the overall deviation across all structures. Relative to an ideal reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) solution, the proposed method requires low computational cost, is straightforward to implement, results in a realistic vehicle configuration for the live-load model, and provides reasonable accuracy. The method was found to be slightly superior to the existing best-selection approach for large databases, but significantly better for small databases.
    publisherASCE
    titleModified Best-Selection Method for Bridge Live-Load Model Development
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume8
    journal issue3
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0001248
    journal fristpage04022027
    journal lastpage04022027-13
    page13
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian