YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Reliability of Existing and Proposed North American Design Provisions for RHS Compression Members with Slender Elements

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 008::page 04022108
    Author:
    Kyle Tousignant
    ,
    Kamran Tayyebi
    ,
    Min Sun
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003430
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Design provisions for axially compressed rectangular hollow section (RHS) members with slender elements were evaluated using an approximate first-order reliability method analysis. A total of 342 nonlinear finite-element models, covering a range of width-to-thickness, height-to-thickness, and nondimensional slenderness ratios, were developed and analyzed. Calculated ranges of reliability indexes (β+) were computed and compared with β+ values obtained from the expanded separation factor approach and with target values in codes. The results showed that the Canadian Standards Association (CSA S16:19) design provisions for locally slender RHS compression members are imprecise, resulting in underpredictions of column strength by as much as 22%. AISC 360-16 design provisions, and a recently proposed modified CSA approach were shown to be better predictors. Considering all 342 columns together, the current resistance factor of ϕ=0.9 was shown to be acceptable in both codes.
    • Download: (2.950Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Reliability of Existing and Proposed North American Design Provisions for RHS Compression Members with Slender Elements

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286728
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKyle Tousignant
    contributor authorKamran Tayyebi
    contributor authorMin Sun
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:30:30Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:30:30Z
    date issued2022/06/13
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0003430.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286728
    description abstractDesign provisions for axially compressed rectangular hollow section (RHS) members with slender elements were evaluated using an approximate first-order reliability method analysis. A total of 342 nonlinear finite-element models, covering a range of width-to-thickness, height-to-thickness, and nondimensional slenderness ratios, were developed and analyzed. Calculated ranges of reliability indexes (β+) were computed and compared with β+ values obtained from the expanded separation factor approach and with target values in codes. The results showed that the Canadian Standards Association (CSA S16:19) design provisions for locally slender RHS compression members are imprecise, resulting in underpredictions of column strength by as much as 22%. AISC 360-16 design provisions, and a recently proposed modified CSA approach were shown to be better predictors. Considering all 342 columns together, the current resistance factor of ϕ=0.9 was shown to be acceptable in both codes.
    publisherASCE
    titleReliability of Existing and Proposed North American Design Provisions for RHS Compression Members with Slender Elements
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume148
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003430
    journal fristpage04022108
    journal lastpage04022108-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian