Show simple item record

contributor authorKyle Tousignant
contributor authorKamran Tayyebi
contributor authorMin Sun
date accessioned2022-08-18T12:30:30Z
date available2022-08-18T12:30:30Z
date issued2022/06/13
identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0003430.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286728
description abstractDesign provisions for axially compressed rectangular hollow section (RHS) members with slender elements were evaluated using an approximate first-order reliability method analysis. A total of 342 nonlinear finite-element models, covering a range of width-to-thickness, height-to-thickness, and nondimensional slenderness ratios, were developed and analyzed. Calculated ranges of reliability indexes (β+) were computed and compared with β+ values obtained from the expanded separation factor approach and with target values in codes. The results showed that the Canadian Standards Association (CSA S16:19) design provisions for locally slender RHS compression members are imprecise, resulting in underpredictions of column strength by as much as 22%. AISC 360-16 design provisions, and a recently proposed modified CSA approach were shown to be better predictors. Considering all 342 columns together, the current resistance factor of ϕ=0.9 was shown to be acceptable in both codes.
publisherASCE
titleReliability of Existing and Proposed North American Design Provisions for RHS Compression Members with Slender Elements
typeJournal Article
journal volume148
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003430
journal fristpage04022108
journal lastpage04022108-15
page15
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record