YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Structural Assessment of AASHTO Type II Prestressed Concrete Girder with GFRP or Stainless-Steel Shear Reinforcement

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 007::page 04022056
    Author:
    Anwer Al-Kaimakchi
    ,
    Michelle Rambo-Roddenberry
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001899
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Concrete bridges in extremely aggressive environments deteriorate mainly from corrosion of carbon steel prestressing strands and rebars. In prestressed concrete girders, corrosion might occur in the transverse reinforcement, which results in a decrease in shear resistance. Corrosion-free glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars and corrosion-resistant stainless steel rebars are promising solutions to address corrosion. However, GFRP rebars have lower ultimate strain, elastic modulus, and transverse shear capacity than stainless steel rebars. Two full-scale 12.8-m (42-ft) long AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) Type II girders with a deck slab on top of them were tested in shear at both ends. One girder was reinforced with duplex stainless steel Grade 520 (75) stirrups, and the other was reinforced with GFRP stirrups. Both girders had 11 carbon steel prestressing strands, each initially stressed to 75% of the strand’s ultimate stress. The girders were composite with a deck slab and had a smooth interface between the girder and slab. The objective was to experimentally assess the structural behavior of the girders. The girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups failed in flexural shear while the girder reinforced with GFRP stirrups failed in interface shear due to the lower transverse shear capacity of GFRP rebars and smooth interface between the girder and slab. The experimental shear force at the failure of the girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups was 9.1% greater than that reinforced with GFRP stirrups. Also, the direct replacement of stainless steel confinement reinforcement with GFRP resulted in strand slippage. It was found that the current AASHTO LRFD shear design provisions are conservative in predicting the vertical shear resistance of a girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups or GFRP stirrups. The research findings will be helpful in the development of design guide specifications for prestressed concrete girders reinforced with GFRP stirrups.
    • Download: (3.390Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Structural Assessment of AASHTO Type II Prestressed Concrete Girder with GFRP or Stainless-Steel Shear Reinforcement

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286620
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAnwer Al-Kaimakchi
    contributor authorMichelle Rambo-Roddenberry
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:26:07Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:26:07Z
    date issued2022/05/16
    identifier other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001899.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286620
    description abstractConcrete bridges in extremely aggressive environments deteriorate mainly from corrosion of carbon steel prestressing strands and rebars. In prestressed concrete girders, corrosion might occur in the transverse reinforcement, which results in a decrease in shear resistance. Corrosion-free glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars and corrosion-resistant stainless steel rebars are promising solutions to address corrosion. However, GFRP rebars have lower ultimate strain, elastic modulus, and transverse shear capacity than stainless steel rebars. Two full-scale 12.8-m (42-ft) long AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) Type II girders with a deck slab on top of them were tested in shear at both ends. One girder was reinforced with duplex stainless steel Grade 520 (75) stirrups, and the other was reinforced with GFRP stirrups. Both girders had 11 carbon steel prestressing strands, each initially stressed to 75% of the strand’s ultimate stress. The girders were composite with a deck slab and had a smooth interface between the girder and slab. The objective was to experimentally assess the structural behavior of the girders. The girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups failed in flexural shear while the girder reinforced with GFRP stirrups failed in interface shear due to the lower transverse shear capacity of GFRP rebars and smooth interface between the girder and slab. The experimental shear force at the failure of the girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups was 9.1% greater than that reinforced with GFRP stirrups. Also, the direct replacement of stainless steel confinement reinforcement with GFRP resulted in strand slippage. It was found that the current AASHTO LRFD shear design provisions are conservative in predicting the vertical shear resistance of a girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups or GFRP stirrups. The research findings will be helpful in the development of design guide specifications for prestressed concrete girders reinforced with GFRP stirrups.
    publisherASCE
    titleStructural Assessment of AASHTO Type II Prestressed Concrete Girder with GFRP or Stainless-Steel Shear Reinforcement
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume27
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001899
    journal fristpage04022056
    journal lastpage04022056-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian