YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Impact of Integration of the Production Systems and Reservoir of a Benchmark Based on Carbonate Fields

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009::page 94501-1
    Author:
    Victorino, I. R. S.
    ,
    Hohendorff Filho, J. C. V.
    ,
    Castro, M. S.
    ,
    Schiozer, D. J.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4053435
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Integrating production system and reservoir is used in several studies of offshore oilfield development and management for improved production forecasts through more realistic boundary conditions. This study evaluates the influence of the parameters in a production strategy of a reference model (carbonate oil reservoir) on financial and production performance. We first considered nonintegrated system (NI) with the reservoir and fixed boundary conditions for well and gathering system. We then considered integrated system (I) with the variable boundary conditions for the wells and gathering system. Finally, we compared both systems. Our analysis involved several steps to define the best production strategy for both systems based on net present value (NPV) and how integrated modeling helps define production strategy. For NI, three stages were considered: number of wells, placement of wells, and platform capacity. For I, five stages were evaluated (all NI parameters) with diameters and gas lift evaluation, and platform placement. The results are similar, but the simplifications (NI) may affect financial performance. The cross analysis indicated (in the hypothesis that the integrated system is closer to reality) that integrating the NI case resulted in considerable financial and production differences and may be useful in simplified systems. Since the main aspects of the object-function financial return were related to reservoir model behavior, one can first apply the nonintegrated optimization cycles, then add the integrated cycles, obtaining an intermediate time of the integrated model optimization in similar cases.
    • Download: (1.767Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Impact of Integration of the Production Systems and Reservoir of a Benchmark Based on Carbonate Fields

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4285456
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVictorino, I. R. S.
    contributor authorHohendorff Filho, J. C. V.
    contributor authorCastro, M. S.
    contributor authorSchiozer, D. J.
    date accessioned2022-05-08T09:41:15Z
    date available2022-05-08T09:41:15Z
    date copyright2/9/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherjert_144_9_094501.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4285456
    description abstractIntegrating production system and reservoir is used in several studies of offshore oilfield development and management for improved production forecasts through more realistic boundary conditions. This study evaluates the influence of the parameters in a production strategy of a reference model (carbonate oil reservoir) on financial and production performance. We first considered nonintegrated system (NI) with the reservoir and fixed boundary conditions for well and gathering system. We then considered integrated system (I) with the variable boundary conditions for the wells and gathering system. Finally, we compared both systems. Our analysis involved several steps to define the best production strategy for both systems based on net present value (NPV) and how integrated modeling helps define production strategy. For NI, three stages were considered: number of wells, placement of wells, and platform capacity. For I, five stages were evaluated (all NI parameters) with diameters and gas lift evaluation, and platform placement. The results are similar, but the simplifications (NI) may affect financial performance. The cross analysis indicated (in the hypothesis that the integrated system is closer to reality) that integrating the NI case resulted in considerable financial and production differences and may be useful in simplified systems. Since the main aspects of the object-function financial return were related to reservoir model behavior, one can first apply the nonintegrated optimization cycles, then add the integrated cycles, obtaining an intermediate time of the integrated model optimization in similar cases.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleImpact of Integration of the Production Systems and Reservoir of a Benchmark Based on Carbonate Fields
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4053435
    journal fristpage94501-1
    journal lastpage94501-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian