A New Method for Quantifying Abdominal Aortic Wall Shear Stress Using Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Womersley SolutionSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009::page 91011-1Author:Iffrig, Elizabeth
,
Timmins, Lucas H.
,
El Sayed, Retta
,
Taylor, W. Robert
,
Oshinski, John N.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4054236Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Wall shear stress (WSS) is an important mediator of cardiovascular pathologies and there is a need for its reliable evaluation as a potential prognostic indicator. The purpose of this work was to develop a method that quantifies WSS from two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast magnetic resonance (PCMR) imaging derived flow waveforms, apply this method to PCMR data acquired in the abdominal aorta of healthy volunteers, and to compare PCMR-derived WSS values to values predicted from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. The method uses PCMR-derived flow versus time waveforms constrained by the Womersley solution for pulsatile flow in a cylindrical tube. The method was evaluated for sensitivity to input parameters, intrastudy repeatability and was compared with results from a patient-specific CFD simulation. 2D-PCMR data were acquired in the aortas of healthy men (n = 12) and women (n = 15) and time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) was compared. Agreement was observed when comparing TAWSS between CFD and the PCMR flow-based method with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 (CFD: 15.0 ± 1.9 versus MRI: 13.5 ± 2.4 dyn/cm2) though comparison of WSS values between the PCMR-based method and CFD predictions indicate that the PCMR method underestimated instantaneous WSS by 3.7 ± 7.6 dyn/cm2. We found no significant difference in TAWSS magnitude between the sexes
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Iffrig, Elizabeth | |
contributor author | Timmins, Lucas H. | |
contributor author | El Sayed, Retta | |
contributor author | Taylor, W. Robert | |
contributor author | Oshinski, John N. | |
date accessioned | 2022-05-08T08:42:24Z | |
date available | 2022-05-08T08:42:24Z | |
date copyright | 4/19/2022 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2022 | |
identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
identifier other | bio_144_09_091011.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284237 | |
description abstract | Wall shear stress (WSS) is an important mediator of cardiovascular pathologies and there is a need for its reliable evaluation as a potential prognostic indicator. The purpose of this work was to develop a method that quantifies WSS from two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast magnetic resonance (PCMR) imaging derived flow waveforms, apply this method to PCMR data acquired in the abdominal aorta of healthy volunteers, and to compare PCMR-derived WSS values to values predicted from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. The method uses PCMR-derived flow versus time waveforms constrained by the Womersley solution for pulsatile flow in a cylindrical tube. The method was evaluated for sensitivity to input parameters, intrastudy repeatability and was compared with results from a patient-specific CFD simulation. 2D-PCMR data were acquired in the aortas of healthy men (n = 12) and women (n = 15) and time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) was compared. Agreement was observed when comparing TAWSS between CFD and the PCMR flow-based method with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 (CFD: 15.0 ± 1.9 versus MRI: 13.5 ± 2.4 dyn/cm2) though comparison of WSS values between the PCMR-based method and CFD predictions indicate that the PCMR method underestimated instantaneous WSS by 3.7 ± 7.6 dyn/cm2. We found no significant difference in TAWSS magnitude between the sexes | |
description abstract | 8.19 ± 2.25 versus 8.07 ± 1.71 dyn/cm2, p = 0.16 for men and women, respectively. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | A New Method for Quantifying Abdominal Aortic Wall Shear Stress Using Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Womersley Solution | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 144 | |
journal issue | 9 | |
journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4054236 | |
journal fristpage | 91011-1 | |
journal lastpage | 91011-11 | |
page | 11 | |
tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |