Evaluation of Testing Uncertainties for the Impact Resistance of Machine GuardsSource: ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2021:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 002::page 21203-1Author:Landi, Luca
,
Uhlmann, Eckart
,
Hörl, Robert
,
Thom, Simon
,
Gigliotti, Giuseppe
,
Stecconi, Alessandro
DOI: 10.1115/1.4052995Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Machine guards provide protection against the ejection of parts during operation, such as chips or workpiece fragments. They are considered safe if the impact resistance is at least as high as the resulting projectile energy in the worst case of damage. To protect the machine operator, the impact resistance of machine guards is determined according to ISO standards. The bisection method can be used to determine the impact resistance through impact tests. However, this method is inaccurate for a small number of impact tests and does not indicate uncertainties in the determination. Moreover, the result of testing is validated in different ways depending on the standard utilized for testing. Relevant uncertainties affecting impact testing and a new probabilistic approach for assessing the impact resistance using the Recht and Ipson equation are presented. With multiple impact tests at different initial velocities a Recht and Ipson best-fit curve and a confidence interval for a ballistic limit can be obtained, which is used to determine the impact resistance by defining a velocity reduction coefficient. This method can be applied to any machine guard made of ductile material. This paper validates the Recht and Ipson method by performing impact tests with a standardized 2.5 kg projectile on polycarbonate sheets of different thicknesses. Determination of the ballistic limit showed good agreement with experimental results. With the ballistic limits, the velocity reduction coefficients have been found to determine the impact resistances. Therefore, an alternative method for standardized tests to determine the impact resistance was found.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Landi, Luca | |
| contributor author | Uhlmann, Eckart | |
| contributor author | Hörl, Robert | |
| contributor author | Thom, Simon | |
| contributor author | Gigliotti, Giuseppe | |
| contributor author | Stecconi, Alessandro | |
| date accessioned | 2022-05-08T08:41:01Z | |
| date available | 2022-05-08T08:41:01Z | |
| date copyright | 12/14/2021 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2021 | |
| identifier issn | 2332-9017 | |
| identifier other | risk_008_02_021203.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284209 | |
| description abstract | Machine guards provide protection against the ejection of parts during operation, such as chips or workpiece fragments. They are considered safe if the impact resistance is at least as high as the resulting projectile energy in the worst case of damage. To protect the machine operator, the impact resistance of machine guards is determined according to ISO standards. The bisection method can be used to determine the impact resistance through impact tests. However, this method is inaccurate for a small number of impact tests and does not indicate uncertainties in the determination. Moreover, the result of testing is validated in different ways depending on the standard utilized for testing. Relevant uncertainties affecting impact testing and a new probabilistic approach for assessing the impact resistance using the Recht and Ipson equation are presented. With multiple impact tests at different initial velocities a Recht and Ipson best-fit curve and a confidence interval for a ballistic limit can be obtained, which is used to determine the impact resistance by defining a velocity reduction coefficient. This method can be applied to any machine guard made of ductile material. This paper validates the Recht and Ipson method by performing impact tests with a standardized 2.5 kg projectile on polycarbonate sheets of different thicknesses. Determination of the ballistic limit showed good agreement with experimental results. With the ballistic limits, the velocity reduction coefficients have been found to determine the impact resistances. Therefore, an alternative method for standardized tests to determine the impact resistance was found. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Evaluation of Testing Uncertainties for the Impact Resistance of Machine Guards | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 8 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4052995 | |
| journal fristpage | 21203-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 21203-7 | |
| page | 7 | |
| tree | ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2021:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |