YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Uncertainty Quantification for Additive Manufacturing Process Improvement: Recent Advances

    Source: ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2022:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 001::page 10801-1
    Author:
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    ,
    Nath, Paromita
    ,
    Hu, Zhen
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4053184
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper reviews the state of the art in applying uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods to additive manufacturing (AM). Physics-based as well as data-driven models are increasingly being developed and refined in order to support process optimization and control objectives in AM, in particular to maximize the quality and minimize the variability of the AM product. However, before using these models for decision-making, a fundamental question that needs to be answered is to what degree the models can be trusted, and consider the various uncertainty sources that affect their prediction. UQ in AM is not trivial because of the complex multiphysics, multiscale phenomena in the AM process. This article reviews the literature on UQ methodologies focusing on model uncertainty, discusses the corresponding activities of calibration, verification, and validation, and examines their applications reported in the AM literature. The extension of current UQ methodologies to additive manufacturing needs to address multiphysics, multiscale interactions, increasing presence of data-driven models, high cost of manufacturing, and complexity of measurements. The activities that need to be undertaken in order to implement verification, calibration, and validation for AM are discussed. Literature on using the results of UQ activities toward AM process optimization and control (thus supporting maximization of quality and minimization of variability) is also reviewed. Future research needs both in terms of UQ and decision-making in AM are outlined.
    • Download: (1.262Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Uncertainty Quantification for Additive Manufacturing Process Improvement: Recent Advances

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284200
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMahadevan, Sankaran
    contributor authorNath, Paromita
    contributor authorHu, Zhen
    date accessioned2022-05-08T08:40:37Z
    date available2022-05-08T08:40:37Z
    date copyright1/6/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn2332-9017
    identifier otherrisk_008_01_010801.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284200
    description abstractThis paper reviews the state of the art in applying uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods to additive manufacturing (AM). Physics-based as well as data-driven models are increasingly being developed and refined in order to support process optimization and control objectives in AM, in particular to maximize the quality and minimize the variability of the AM product. However, before using these models for decision-making, a fundamental question that needs to be answered is to what degree the models can be trusted, and consider the various uncertainty sources that affect their prediction. UQ in AM is not trivial because of the complex multiphysics, multiscale phenomena in the AM process. This article reviews the literature on UQ methodologies focusing on model uncertainty, discusses the corresponding activities of calibration, verification, and validation, and examines their applications reported in the AM literature. The extension of current UQ methodologies to additive manufacturing needs to address multiphysics, multiscale interactions, increasing presence of data-driven models, high cost of manufacturing, and complexity of measurements. The activities that need to be undertaken in order to implement verification, calibration, and validation for AM are discussed. Literature on using the results of UQ activities toward AM process optimization and control (thus supporting maximization of quality and minimization of variability) is also reviewed. Future research needs both in terms of UQ and decision-making in AM are outlined.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleUncertainty Quantification for Additive Manufacturing Process Improvement: Recent Advances
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume8
    journal issue1
    journal titleASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4053184
    journal fristpage10801-1
    journal lastpage10801-14
    page14
    treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2022:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian