YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Centrifuge Performance of SCM Wall–Reinforced Pile-Supported Wharf Subjected to Yard Loads

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 005::page 04022026
    Author:
    H. Q. Zhang
    ,
    Z. Yan
    ,
    S. Li
    ,
    L. Liu
    ,
    Y. H. Yang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002793
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Yard loads may induce slope deformation and compress the piles of pile-supported wharfs, resulting in structural damage. In this paper, centrifuge tests were conducted to investigate yard load induced performances of pile-supported wharfs reinforced with T-shaped and F-shaped soil cement mixing (TSCM and FSCM, respectively) retaining walls. The TSCM and FSCM walls were located in the bent-yard connecting section and wharf performances were presented in terms of soil movements, bent displacements, soil and pore pressures, and pile bending moments. The results show that the slope soil migrated toward the waterside as the soil cement mixing (SCM) walls tilted, inducing tilting failure of the pile-supported wharf. The FSCM wall–reinforced bent showed greater displacements than the TSCM wall–reinforced bent at the same load intensities. Pore pressures were registered immediately after yard loads were applied but dropped to constant values or kept decreasing over time during the unloading period. Soil pressures generally increased with yard loading in the upper part but exhibited increasing-decreasing tendencies in the lower part. The soil pressures on the FSCM side were generally greater than those on the TSCM side in the upper and middle parts but smaller in the lower part. The bending moments on the FSCM side were generally larger than those on the TSCM side on landside because the structure-soil interaction was more intense. SCM walls are feasible and beneficial for reinforcing pile-supported wharfs under yard loads, and TSCM walls seem to be superior to FSCM walls considering their improved performance and economic efficiency.
    • Download: (3.276Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Centrifuge Performance of SCM Wall–Reinforced Pile-Supported Wharf Subjected to Yard Loads

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283622
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorH. Q. Zhang
    contributor authorZ. Yan
    contributor authorS. Li
    contributor authorL. Liu
    contributor authorY. H. Yang
    date accessioned2022-05-07T21:21:06Z
    date available2022-05-07T21:21:06Z
    date issued2022-03-10
    identifier other(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002793.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283622
    description abstractYard loads may induce slope deformation and compress the piles of pile-supported wharfs, resulting in structural damage. In this paper, centrifuge tests were conducted to investigate yard load induced performances of pile-supported wharfs reinforced with T-shaped and F-shaped soil cement mixing (TSCM and FSCM, respectively) retaining walls. The TSCM and FSCM walls were located in the bent-yard connecting section and wharf performances were presented in terms of soil movements, bent displacements, soil and pore pressures, and pile bending moments. The results show that the slope soil migrated toward the waterside as the soil cement mixing (SCM) walls tilted, inducing tilting failure of the pile-supported wharf. The FSCM wall–reinforced bent showed greater displacements than the TSCM wall–reinforced bent at the same load intensities. Pore pressures were registered immediately after yard loads were applied but dropped to constant values or kept decreasing over time during the unloading period. Soil pressures generally increased with yard loading in the upper part but exhibited increasing-decreasing tendencies in the lower part. The soil pressures on the FSCM side were generally greater than those on the TSCM side in the upper and middle parts but smaller in the lower part. The bending moments on the FSCM side were generally larger than those on the TSCM side on landside because the structure-soil interaction was more intense. SCM walls are feasible and beneficial for reinforcing pile-supported wharfs under yard loads, and TSCM walls seem to be superior to FSCM walls considering their improved performance and economic efficiency.
    publisherASCE
    titleCentrifuge Performance of SCM Wall–Reinforced Pile-Supported Wharf Subjected to Yard Loads
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002793
    journal fristpage04022026
    journal lastpage04022026-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian