Robust Optimization Method for Mountain Railway Alignments Considering Preference Uncertainty for Costs and Seismic RisksSource: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 001::page 04021077DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001207Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: Railways are vital infrastructures whose design is complex and time-consuming. In addition to multiple conflicting objectives and highly-constrained search spaces, their design also faces great uncertainties. The aim of this study is to optimize railway alignments considering decision-makers’ preference uncertainty for multiple objectives, which can influence the alignment determination macroscopically and fundamentally. First, a multiobjective model is built by integrating costs (including construction and operation costs) and seismic risks (including direct and indirect losses) for mountain railway optimization. To solve this model, a particle swarm algorithm is improved by incorporating a multicriteria tournament decision (MTD). Then, a robust optimization MTD (RO-MTD) method is developed to find cost-risk tradeoffs by addressing the uncertainty of decision-makers’ preferences. The major steps of the RO-MTD include (1) treating uncertain preferences as variables, (2) sampling the uncertain space of preferences, (3) analyzing all possible preference scenarios, and (4) integrating those analyses to achieve a robust evaluation. Finally, the preceding approaches are applied to a complicated real-world case. By comparing the RO-MTD and MTD as well as the computer-generated alignment and the best manually-designed one, the effectiveness of the proposed method is confirmed.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Taoran Song | |
contributor author | Hao Pu | |
contributor author | Paul Schonfeld | |
contributor author | Jianping Hu | |
contributor author | Jiangtao Liu | |
date accessioned | 2022-05-07T20:39:47Z | |
date available | 2022-05-07T20:39:47Z | |
date issued | 2021-11-25 | |
identifier other | AJRUA6.0001207.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282726 | |
description abstract | Railways are vital infrastructures whose design is complex and time-consuming. In addition to multiple conflicting objectives and highly-constrained search spaces, their design also faces great uncertainties. The aim of this study is to optimize railway alignments considering decision-makers’ preference uncertainty for multiple objectives, which can influence the alignment determination macroscopically and fundamentally. First, a multiobjective model is built by integrating costs (including construction and operation costs) and seismic risks (including direct and indirect losses) for mountain railway optimization. To solve this model, a particle swarm algorithm is improved by incorporating a multicriteria tournament decision (MTD). Then, a robust optimization MTD (RO-MTD) method is developed to find cost-risk tradeoffs by addressing the uncertainty of decision-makers’ preferences. The major steps of the RO-MTD include (1) treating uncertain preferences as variables, (2) sampling the uncertain space of preferences, (3) analyzing all possible preference scenarios, and (4) integrating those analyses to achieve a robust evaluation. Finally, the preceding approaches are applied to a complicated real-world case. By comparing the RO-MTD and MTD as well as the computer-generated alignment and the best manually-designed one, the effectiveness of the proposed method is confirmed. | |
publisher | ASCE | |
title | Robust Optimization Method for Mountain Railway Alignments Considering Preference Uncertainty for Costs and Seismic Risks | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 8 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001207 | |
journal fristpage | 04021077 | |
journal lastpage | 04021077-11 | |
page | 11 | |
tree | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |