YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Generation and Enforcement of Process-Driven Manufacturability Constraints: A Survey of Methods and Perspectives for Product Design

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 011::page 0110801-1
    Author:
    Patterson, Albert E.
    ,
    Lee, Yong Hoon
    ,
    Allison, James T.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4050740
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Design-for-manufacturing (DFM) concepts have traditionally focused on design simplification; this is highly effective for relatively simple, mass-produced products, but tends to be too restrictive for more complex designs. Effort in recent decades has focused on creating methods for generating and imposing specific, process-derived technical manufacturability constraints for some common problems. This paper presents an overview of the problem and its design implications, a discussion of the nature of the manufacturability constraints, and a survey of the existing approaches and methods for generating/enforcing the minimally restrictive manufacturability constraints within several design domains. Five major design perspectives or viewpoints were included in the survey, including the system design (top-down), product/component design (bottom-up), the manufacturing process-dominant case (product/component design under a specific process), the part-redesign perspective, and sustainability perspective. Manufacturability constraints within four design levels or scales were explored as well, ranging from macro-scale to sub-micro-scale design. Very little previous work was found in many areas, revealing several gaps in the literature. What is clearly needed is a more general, design-method-independent approach to collecting and enforcing manufacturability constraints.
    • Download: (1.421Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Generation and Enforcement of Process-Driven Manufacturability Constraints: A Survey of Methods and Perspectives for Product Design

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278680
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPatterson, Albert E.
    contributor authorLee, Yong Hoon
    contributor authorAllison, James T.
    date accessioned2022-02-06T05:45:03Z
    date available2022-02-06T05:45:03Z
    date copyright5/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_143_11_110801.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278680
    description abstractDesign-for-manufacturing (DFM) concepts have traditionally focused on design simplification; this is highly effective for relatively simple, mass-produced products, but tends to be too restrictive for more complex designs. Effort in recent decades has focused on creating methods for generating and imposing specific, process-derived technical manufacturability constraints for some common problems. This paper presents an overview of the problem and its design implications, a discussion of the nature of the manufacturability constraints, and a survey of the existing approaches and methods for generating/enforcing the minimally restrictive manufacturability constraints within several design domains. Five major design perspectives or viewpoints were included in the survey, including the system design (top-down), product/component design (bottom-up), the manufacturing process-dominant case (product/component design under a specific process), the part-redesign perspective, and sustainability perspective. Manufacturability constraints within four design levels or scales were explored as well, ranging from macro-scale to sub-micro-scale design. Very little previous work was found in many areas, revealing several gaps in the literature. What is clearly needed is a more general, design-method-independent approach to collecting and enforcing manufacturability constraints.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleGeneration and Enforcement of Process-Driven Manufacturability Constraints: A Survey of Methods and Perspectives for Product Design
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4050740
    journal fristpage0110801-1
    journal lastpage0110801-17
    page17
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian