YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Failure Strain and Fracture Prediction During Shock Tube Impact Forming of AA 5052-H32 Sheet

    Source: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003::page 031009-1
    Author:
    Barik, Saibal Kanchan
    ,
    Ganesh Narayanan, R.
    ,
    Sahoo, Niranjan
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4050703
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The present study deals with both numerical and experimental evaluation of failure strain and fracture pattern during shock tube impact forming of 1.5 mm thick AA 5052-H32 sheet. A hemispherical end nylon striker is propelled to deform the sheet at different velocities. Here, the main objective is to understand the effect of flow stress models and fracture models on the forming outputs. The experimental situation is modeled in two stages, i.e., incorporating the pressure in the first stage and displacement of the striker in the second stage in finite element simulation using the finite element (FE) code (DEFORM-3D). A new strategy followed to evaluate the rate-dependent flow stress data from the tensile test of samples sectioned from shock tube-based deformed sheet is acceptable, and finite element simulations incorporating these properties predicted accurate failure strain and fracture pattern. Out of all the flow stress models, the modified Johnson–Cook model has a better flow stress predictability due to the inclusion of the non-linear strain rate sensitivity term in the model. During the prediction of the failure strain and necking location, the Cockcroft–Latham failure model, Brozzo failure model, and Freudenthal failure model have a fair agreement with experimental data in combination with the two flow stress models, i.e., Johnson–Cook model and modified Johnson–Cook model.
    • Download: (2.359Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Failure Strain and Fracture Prediction During Shock Tube Impact Forming of AA 5052-H32 Sheet

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278659
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBarik, Saibal Kanchan
    contributor authorGanesh Narayanan, R.
    contributor authorSahoo, Niranjan
    date accessioned2022-02-06T05:44:30Z
    date available2022-02-06T05:44:30Z
    date copyright4/19/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier issn0094-4289
    identifier othermats_143_3_031009.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278659
    description abstractThe present study deals with both numerical and experimental evaluation of failure strain and fracture pattern during shock tube impact forming of 1.5 mm thick AA 5052-H32 sheet. A hemispherical end nylon striker is propelled to deform the sheet at different velocities. Here, the main objective is to understand the effect of flow stress models and fracture models on the forming outputs. The experimental situation is modeled in two stages, i.e., incorporating the pressure in the first stage and displacement of the striker in the second stage in finite element simulation using the finite element (FE) code (DEFORM-3D). A new strategy followed to evaluate the rate-dependent flow stress data from the tensile test of samples sectioned from shock tube-based deformed sheet is acceptable, and finite element simulations incorporating these properties predicted accurate failure strain and fracture pattern. Out of all the flow stress models, the modified Johnson–Cook model has a better flow stress predictability due to the inclusion of the non-linear strain rate sensitivity term in the model. During the prediction of the failure strain and necking location, the Cockcroft–Latham failure model, Brozzo failure model, and Freudenthal failure model have a fair agreement with experimental data in combination with the two flow stress models, i.e., Johnson–Cook model and modified Johnson–Cook model.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleFailure Strain and Fracture Prediction During Shock Tube Impact Forming of AA 5052-H32 Sheet
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4050703
    journal fristpage031009-1
    journal lastpage031009-14
    page14
    treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian