YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of High Fidelity Modeling of Multirotor Drones

    Source: Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems:;2021:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 001::page 011007-1
    Author:
    Hoang, Samantha
    ,
    Marsh, Laurel
    ,
    Aliseda, Alberto
    ,
    Shen, I. Y.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4050013
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper examines two different factors that will affect energy consumption for multi-rotor drones with more than four rotors. First, the choice of aerodynamic model for the rotor blades is examined. Two aerodynamic models, the blade element theory (BET) model and lumped blade (LB) model, are compared using vertical, roll, pitch, and yaw trajectories. The BET and LB models produced very different trajectories with identical inputs, especially in the vertical and yaw trajectories which differed by 87.9% and 52.5%, respectively. The BET and LB models also result in different energy usages with the LB model consistently predicting 36% more energy consumption. The second factor studied is the choice of rotor groupings. For a multi-rotor drone, different rotor groupings may result in different energy usages; two groupings are considered. The same four basic trajectories are compared. The results show that the two groupings have an energy difference of 4.7–4.9% for each of the roll, pitch, and yaw directions which implies that each grouping has a base energy consumption inherent to it. Then, possible energy compounding effects are explored by examining a complex trajectory. The complex trajectory yields a 9.26% energy difference between the two groupings but further examination reveals that the difference is due to differences in the final trajectory not energy compounding effects. Thus, it is concluded that the aerodynamic model and rotor groupings are two important factors that must be considered when energy consumption needs to be minimized.
    • Download: (985.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of High Fidelity Modeling of Multirotor Drones

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278401
    Collections
    • Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHoang, Samantha
    contributor authorMarsh, Laurel
    contributor authorAliseda, Alberto
    contributor authorShen, I. Y.
    date accessioned2022-02-06T05:36:58Z
    date available2022-02-06T05:36:58Z
    date copyright2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier issn2690-702X
    identifier otherjavs_1_1_011007.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278401
    description abstractThis paper examines two different factors that will affect energy consumption for multi-rotor drones with more than four rotors. First, the choice of aerodynamic model for the rotor blades is examined. Two aerodynamic models, the blade element theory (BET) model and lumped blade (LB) model, are compared using vertical, roll, pitch, and yaw trajectories. The BET and LB models produced very different trajectories with identical inputs, especially in the vertical and yaw trajectories which differed by 87.9% and 52.5%, respectively. The BET and LB models also result in different energy usages with the LB model consistently predicting 36% more energy consumption. The second factor studied is the choice of rotor groupings. For a multi-rotor drone, different rotor groupings may result in different energy usages; two groupings are considered. The same four basic trajectories are compared. The results show that the two groupings have an energy difference of 4.7–4.9% for each of the roll, pitch, and yaw directions which implies that each grouping has a base energy consumption inherent to it. Then, possible energy compounding effects are explored by examining a complex trajectory. The complex trajectory yields a 9.26% energy difference between the two groupings but further examination reveals that the difference is due to differences in the final trajectory not energy compounding effects. Thus, it is concluded that the aerodynamic model and rotor groupings are two important factors that must be considered when energy consumption needs to be minimized.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEffects of High Fidelity Modeling of Multirotor Drones
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume1
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4050013
    journal fristpage011007-1
    journal lastpage011007-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems:;2021:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian