YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Study on the Numerical Methods for View Factor Computation for Packed Pebble Beds: Back Propagation Neural Network Methods Versus Monte Carlo Methods

    Source: Journal of Heat Transfer:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 008::page 083301-1
    Author:
    Zou, Quan
    ,
    Gui, Nan
    ,
    Yang, Xingtuan
    ,
    Tu, Jiyuan
    ,
    Jiang, Shengyao
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4051075
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: It's an unsolved problem to calculate the thermal radiation view factors among fuel pebbles as accurately and quickly as possible in the simulation of the temperature fields within the pebble-bed. In this study, a series of fully connected neural networks (FCNs) has been developed to realize the fast calculation of view factors. In order to verify the accuracy and effects of the networks, the neural networks are compared with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The results show that, in most cases, the relative errors of the FCN method can be controlled within 1.0%, and the prediction accurate probability is up to 99%. In comparisons of specific examples, the temperature errors of the FCN method and the MC method are less than 1 K within the range neural networks have covered. In addition, the time of neural networks for a single calculation is about 2–20 μs, which is even less than 10−4 of the time taken by the MC algorithm. In conclusion, neural networks can greatly improve computational efficiency while keeping the same accuracy as the MC algorithm, which makes real-time simulation of the temperature fields possible.
    • Download: (3.107Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Study on the Numerical Methods for View Factor Computation for Packed Pebble Beds: Back Propagation Neural Network Methods Versus Monte Carlo Methods

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278302
    Collections
    • Journal of Heat Transfer

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZou, Quan
    contributor authorGui, Nan
    contributor authorYang, Xingtuan
    contributor authorTu, Jiyuan
    contributor authorJiang, Shengyao
    date accessioned2022-02-06T05:34:12Z
    date available2022-02-06T05:34:12Z
    date copyright6/2/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier issn0022-1481
    identifier otherht_143_08_083301.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278302
    description abstractIt's an unsolved problem to calculate the thermal radiation view factors among fuel pebbles as accurately and quickly as possible in the simulation of the temperature fields within the pebble-bed. In this study, a series of fully connected neural networks (FCNs) has been developed to realize the fast calculation of view factors. In order to verify the accuracy and effects of the networks, the neural networks are compared with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The results show that, in most cases, the relative errors of the FCN method can be controlled within 1.0%, and the prediction accurate probability is up to 99%. In comparisons of specific examples, the temperature errors of the FCN method and the MC method are less than 1 K within the range neural networks have covered. In addition, the time of neural networks for a single calculation is about 2–20 μs, which is even less than 10−4 of the time taken by the MC algorithm. In conclusion, neural networks can greatly improve computational efficiency while keeping the same accuracy as the MC algorithm, which makes real-time simulation of the temperature fields possible.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparative Study on the Numerical Methods for View Factor Computation for Packed Pebble Beds: Back Propagation Neural Network Methods Versus Monte Carlo Methods
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Heat Transfer
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4051075
    journal fristpage083301-1
    journal lastpage083301-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian