Comparative Study on the Numerical Methods for View Factor Computation for Packed Pebble Beds: Back Propagation Neural Network Methods Versus Monte Carlo MethodsSource: Journal of Heat Transfer:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 008::page 083301-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4051075Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: It's an unsolved problem to calculate the thermal radiation view factors among fuel pebbles as accurately and quickly as possible in the simulation of the temperature fields within the pebble-bed. In this study, a series of fully connected neural networks (FCNs) has been developed to realize the fast calculation of view factors. In order to verify the accuracy and effects of the networks, the neural networks are compared with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The results show that, in most cases, the relative errors of the FCN method can be controlled within 1.0%, and the prediction accurate probability is up to 99%. In comparisons of specific examples, the temperature errors of the FCN method and the MC method are less than 1 K within the range neural networks have covered. In addition, the time of neural networks for a single calculation is about 2–20 μs, which is even less than 10−4 of the time taken by the MC algorithm. In conclusion, neural networks can greatly improve computational efficiency while keeping the same accuracy as the MC algorithm, which makes real-time simulation of the temperature fields possible.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Zou, Quan | |
contributor author | Gui, Nan | |
contributor author | Yang, Xingtuan | |
contributor author | Tu, Jiyuan | |
contributor author | Jiang, Shengyao | |
date accessioned | 2022-02-06T05:34:12Z | |
date available | 2022-02-06T05:34:12Z | |
date copyright | 6/2/2021 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2021 | |
identifier issn | 0022-1481 | |
identifier other | ht_143_08_083301.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278302 | |
description abstract | It's an unsolved problem to calculate the thermal radiation view factors among fuel pebbles as accurately and quickly as possible in the simulation of the temperature fields within the pebble-bed. In this study, a series of fully connected neural networks (FCNs) has been developed to realize the fast calculation of view factors. In order to verify the accuracy and effects of the networks, the neural networks are compared with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The results show that, in most cases, the relative errors of the FCN method can be controlled within 1.0%, and the prediction accurate probability is up to 99%. In comparisons of specific examples, the temperature errors of the FCN method and the MC method are less than 1 K within the range neural networks have covered. In addition, the time of neural networks for a single calculation is about 2–20 μs, which is even less than 10−4 of the time taken by the MC algorithm. In conclusion, neural networks can greatly improve computational efficiency while keeping the same accuracy as the MC algorithm, which makes real-time simulation of the temperature fields possible. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Comparative Study on the Numerical Methods for View Factor Computation for Packed Pebble Beds: Back Propagation Neural Network Methods Versus Monte Carlo Methods | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 143 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Heat Transfer | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4051075 | |
journal fristpage | 083301-1 | |
journal lastpage | 083301-10 | |
page | 10 | |
tree | Journal of Heat Transfer:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |