YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Lid-Driven Square Cavity Flow: A Benchmark Solution With an 8192 × 8192 Grid

    Source: Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2021:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 004::page 041004-1
    Author:
    Marchi, Carlos Henrique
    ,
    Santiago, Cosmo Damião
    ,
    Carvalho, Jr., Carlos Alberto Rezende de
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4052149
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The incompressible steady-state fluid flow inside a lid-driven square cavity was simulated using the mass conservation and Navier–Stokes equations. This system of equations is solved for Reynolds numbers of up to 10,000 to the accuracy of the computational machine round-off error. The computational model used was the second-order accurate finite volume (FV) method. A stable solution is obtained using the iterative multigrid methodology with 8192 × 8192 volumes, while degree-10 interpolation and Richardson extrapolation were used to reduce the discretization error. The solution vector comprised five entries of velocities, pressure, and location. For comparison purposes, 65 different variables of interest were chosen, such as velocity profile, its extremum values and location, and extremum values and location of the stream function. The discretization error for each variable of interest was estimated using two types of estimators and their apparent order of accuracy. The variations of the 11 selected variables are shown across 38 Reynolds number values between 0.0001 and 10,000. In this study, we provide a more accurate determination of the Reynolds number value at which the upper secondary vortex appears. The results of this study were compared with those of several other studies in the literature. The current solution methodology was observed to produce the most accurate solution till date for a wide range of Reynolds numbers.
    • Download: (3.232Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Lid-Driven Square Cavity Flow: A Benchmark Solution With an 8192 × 8192 Grid

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278020
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMarchi, Carlos Henrique
    contributor authorSantiago, Cosmo Damião
    contributor authorCarvalho, Jr., Carlos Alberto Rezende de
    date accessioned2022-02-06T05:26:14Z
    date available2022-02-06T05:26:14Z
    date copyright9/14/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier issn2377-2158
    identifier othervvuq_006_04_041004.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278020
    description abstractThe incompressible steady-state fluid flow inside a lid-driven square cavity was simulated using the mass conservation and Navier–Stokes equations. This system of equations is solved for Reynolds numbers of up to 10,000 to the accuracy of the computational machine round-off error. The computational model used was the second-order accurate finite volume (FV) method. A stable solution is obtained using the iterative multigrid methodology with 8192 × 8192 volumes, while degree-10 interpolation and Richardson extrapolation were used to reduce the discretization error. The solution vector comprised five entries of velocities, pressure, and location. For comparison purposes, 65 different variables of interest were chosen, such as velocity profile, its extremum values and location, and extremum values and location of the stream function. The discretization error for each variable of interest was estimated using two types of estimators and their apparent order of accuracy. The variations of the 11 selected variables are shown across 38 Reynolds number values between 0.0001 and 10,000. In this study, we provide a more accurate determination of the Reynolds number value at which the upper secondary vortex appears. The results of this study were compared with those of several other studies in the literature. The current solution methodology was observed to produce the most accurate solution till date for a wide range of Reynolds numbers.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleLid-Driven Square Cavity Flow: A Benchmark Solution With an 8192 × 8192 Grid
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4052149
    journal fristpage041004-1
    journal lastpage041004-23
    page23
    treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2021:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian