YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of External Load on Sagittal and Frontal Plane Lower Extremity Biomechanics During Back Squats

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 005::page 051006-1
    Author:
    Maddox, Eva U.
    ,
    Bennett, Hunter J.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4049747
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Previous literature suggests the sticking region, the transition period between an early peak concentric velocity to a local minimum, in barbell movements may be the reason for failing repeated submaximal and maximal squats. This study determined the effects of load on lower extremity biomechanics during back squats. Twenty participants performed the NSCA's one-repetition-maximum (1RM) testing protocol, testing to supramaximum loads (failure). After completing the protocol and a 10-min rest, 80% 1RM squats were performed. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to determine vertical velocity, acceleration, ankle, knee, and hip sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics differences between 1RM, submaximum, and supramaximum squats (105% 1RM). Vertical acceleration was a better discriminative measure than velocity, exhibiting differences across all conditions. Supramaximum squats emphasized knee moments, whereas 1RM emphasized hip moments during acceleration. Submaximum squats had reduced hip and knee moments compared to supramaximum squats, but similar knee moments to 1RM squats. Across all conditions, knee loads mirrored accelerations and a prominent knee (acceleration) to hip (sticking) transition existed. These results indicate that (1) submaximum squats performed at increased velocities can provide similar moments at the ankle and knee, but not hip, as maximal loads and (2) significant emphasis on hip strength is necessary for heavy back squats.
    • Download: (1.279Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of External Load on Sagittal and Frontal Plane Lower Extremity Biomechanics During Back Squats

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277903
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMaddox, Eva U.
    contributor authorBennett, Hunter J.
    date accessioned2022-02-05T22:38:50Z
    date available2022-02-05T22:38:50Z
    date copyright3/4/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_143_05_051006.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277903
    description abstractPrevious literature suggests the sticking region, the transition period between an early peak concentric velocity to a local minimum, in barbell movements may be the reason for failing repeated submaximal and maximal squats. This study determined the effects of load on lower extremity biomechanics during back squats. Twenty participants performed the NSCA's one-repetition-maximum (1RM) testing protocol, testing to supramaximum loads (failure). After completing the protocol and a 10-min rest, 80% 1RM squats were performed. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to determine vertical velocity, acceleration, ankle, knee, and hip sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics differences between 1RM, submaximum, and supramaximum squats (105% 1RM). Vertical acceleration was a better discriminative measure than velocity, exhibiting differences across all conditions. Supramaximum squats emphasized knee moments, whereas 1RM emphasized hip moments during acceleration. Submaximum squats had reduced hip and knee moments compared to supramaximum squats, but similar knee moments to 1RM squats. Across all conditions, knee loads mirrored accelerations and a prominent knee (acceleration) to hip (sticking) transition existed. These results indicate that (1) submaximum squats performed at increased velocities can provide similar moments at the ankle and knee, but not hip, as maximal loads and (2) significant emphasis on hip strength is necessary for heavy back squats.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEffects of External Load on Sagittal and Frontal Plane Lower Extremity Biomechanics During Back Squats
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4049747
    journal fristpage051006-1
    journal lastpage051006-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian