A Comparative Study of Metaheuristic Techniques for the Thermoenvironomic Optimization of a Gas Turbine-Based Benchmark Combined Heat and Power SystemSource: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 006::page 062104-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4048534Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: This paper presents a comparative study of four metaheuristic techniques, namely, the particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA), and the harmony search (HS), used in thermoenvironomic optimization of a benchmark gas turbine-based combined heat and power system known as CGAM problem. The performance comparison of the metaheuristic techniques is conducted by executing each algorithm for 30 runs to evaluate the reproducibility and stability of the optimal solutions. The study takes the exergetic, economic, and environmental factors into consideration in defining the thermoenvironomic objective function in terms of system cost rate. The thermodynamic and the economic model vis-à-vis optimization is validated by comparing the present results with previously published ones. From the optimal results, the PSO was found to be the most effective technique for thermoenvironomic optimization of the CGAM problem. Further, to highlight the benefits of optimization, the results obtained from the best method (PSO) are compared with those obtained by using the base case design variables recommended previously for the classical CGAM problem. The comparative results reveal that the system cost rate and the exergoeconomic factor of the CGAM system are reduced by 10.25% and 5.58%, respectively. Besides, the CO2 emission also reduces from 16.34 tons/h to 15.17 tons/h.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Nondy, J. | |
contributor author | Gogoi, T. K. | |
date accessioned | 2022-02-05T22:37:49Z | |
date available | 2022-02-05T22:37:49Z | |
date copyright | 10/27/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2020 | |
identifier issn | 0195-0738 | |
identifier other | jert_143_6_062104.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277874 | |
description abstract | This paper presents a comparative study of four metaheuristic techniques, namely, the particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA), and the harmony search (HS), used in thermoenvironomic optimization of a benchmark gas turbine-based combined heat and power system known as CGAM problem. The performance comparison of the metaheuristic techniques is conducted by executing each algorithm for 30 runs to evaluate the reproducibility and stability of the optimal solutions. The study takes the exergetic, economic, and environmental factors into consideration in defining the thermoenvironomic objective function in terms of system cost rate. The thermodynamic and the economic model vis-à-vis optimization is validated by comparing the present results with previously published ones. From the optimal results, the PSO was found to be the most effective technique for thermoenvironomic optimization of the CGAM problem. Further, to highlight the benefits of optimization, the results obtained from the best method (PSO) are compared with those obtained by using the base case design variables recommended previously for the classical CGAM problem. The comparative results reveal that the system cost rate and the exergoeconomic factor of the CGAM system are reduced by 10.25% and 5.58%, respectively. Besides, the CO2 emission also reduces from 16.34 tons/h to 15.17 tons/h. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | A Comparative Study of Metaheuristic Techniques for the Thermoenvironomic Optimization of a Gas Turbine-Based Benchmark Combined Heat and Power System | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 143 | |
journal issue | 6 | |
journal title | Journal of Energy Resources Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4048534 | |
journal fristpage | 062104-1 | |
journal lastpage | 062104-10 | |
page | 10 | |
tree | Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 006 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |