YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Simulation Analysis of the System Integrating Oxy-Fuel Combustion and Char Gasification

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003::page 032304-1
    Author:
    Liu, Ruochen
    ,
    Graebner, Martin
    ,
    Tsiava, Remi
    ,
    Zhang, Ting
    ,
    Xu, Shenqi
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4049126
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: To explore the feasibility of converting hot flue gas into valuable syngas through char gasification process, Aspen Plus is applied to evaluate the performance of the integrated system including oxy-combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, and flue gas recirculation. The impact of feedstock type (reed straw and municipal solid waste (MSW)), feeding rate (0.1–1 t/h), and flue gas recycle ratio (FGR) (10%–30%) is investigated. The economic analysis of the integrated system is also performed. The results indicate that higher oxygen consumption is required for biomass gasification to reach the same temperature as MSW gasification. The gasification temperature is 750 °C–950 °C under 10%–30% FGR. The CO + H2 content in syngas from biomass gasification is slightly higher than that from MSW gasification. For the integrated system, more natural gas (NG) can be saved and more fossil CO2 can be reduced under biomass gasification. When the feedstock input is 1 t/h, the fossil CO2 emission can be reduced by 70% when taking biomass, the CO2 reduction is double of that when taking MSW. The total OPEX cost can be 26% saved by biomass and 62% saved by MSW due to the government subsidy. If CO2 tax is considered, the advantage of biomass for saving OPEX cost will be more obvious.
    • Download: (1.219Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Simulation Analysis of the System Integrating Oxy-Fuel Combustion and Char Gasification

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277832
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLiu, Ruochen
    contributor authorGraebner, Martin
    contributor authorTsiava, Remi
    contributor authorZhang, Ting
    contributor authorXu, Shenqi
    date accessioned2022-02-05T22:36:18Z
    date available2022-02-05T22:36:18Z
    date copyright12/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherjert_143_3_032304.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277832
    description abstractTo explore the feasibility of converting hot flue gas into valuable syngas through char gasification process, Aspen Plus is applied to evaluate the performance of the integrated system including oxy-combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, and flue gas recirculation. The impact of feedstock type (reed straw and municipal solid waste (MSW)), feeding rate (0.1–1 t/h), and flue gas recycle ratio (FGR) (10%–30%) is investigated. The economic analysis of the integrated system is also performed. The results indicate that higher oxygen consumption is required for biomass gasification to reach the same temperature as MSW gasification. The gasification temperature is 750 °C–950 °C under 10%–30% FGR. The CO + H2 content in syngas from biomass gasification is slightly higher than that from MSW gasification. For the integrated system, more natural gas (NG) can be saved and more fossil CO2 can be reduced under biomass gasification. When the feedstock input is 1 t/h, the fossil CO2 emission can be reduced by 70% when taking biomass, the CO2 reduction is double of that when taking MSW. The total OPEX cost can be 26% saved by biomass and 62% saved by MSW due to the government subsidy. If CO2 tax is considered, the advantage of biomass for saving OPEX cost will be more obvious.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleSimulation Analysis of the System Integrating Oxy-Fuel Combustion and Char Gasification
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4049126
    journal fristpage032304-1
    journal lastpage032304-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian