YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Truncation Error Based Mesh Optimization

    Source: Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 004::page 041003-1
    Author:
    Jackson, Charles W.
    ,
    Roy, Christopher J.
    ,
    Schrock, Christopher R.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4049038
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Truncation error is used to drive mesh adaptation in order to reduce the discretization error in solutions to a variety of 1D and 2D flow problems. The adaptation is performed using r-adaptation to move the mesh nodes in the domain in an attempt to reduce the truncation error since it is the local source of discretization error. Here, we present a new set of r-adaptation methods called mesh optimization along with three different ways of performing this type of adaptation. Each of these techniques uses a finite difference gradient-based local optimization technique with different sets of design variables to create a mesh that minimizes a functional based on truncation error. These new truncation error based mesh optimization techniques are compared to a more common truncation error based mesh equidistribution technique. Some observations on the performance and behavior of the different adaptation methods and best practices for their use are presented. All of the optimization methods are shown to reduce the truncation error one or two orders of magnitude and the discretization error by roughly one order of magnitude for the 1D problems tested. In two dimensions, the optimization-based adaptation methods are able to reduce the discretization error by up to a factor of seven. Mesh equidistribution achieved similar levels of improvement for much less cost compared to the mesh optimization techniques.
    • Download: (4.303Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Truncation Error Based Mesh Optimization

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277090
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJackson, Charles W.
    contributor authorRoy, Christopher J.
    contributor authorSchrock, Christopher R.
    date accessioned2022-02-05T22:11:27Z
    date available2022-02-05T22:11:27Z
    date copyright11/23/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn2377-2158
    identifier othervvuq_005_04_041003.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277090
    description abstractTruncation error is used to drive mesh adaptation in order to reduce the discretization error in solutions to a variety of 1D and 2D flow problems. The adaptation is performed using r-adaptation to move the mesh nodes in the domain in an attempt to reduce the truncation error since it is the local source of discretization error. Here, we present a new set of r-adaptation methods called mesh optimization along with three different ways of performing this type of adaptation. Each of these techniques uses a finite difference gradient-based local optimization technique with different sets of design variables to create a mesh that minimizes a functional based on truncation error. These new truncation error based mesh optimization techniques are compared to a more common truncation error based mesh equidistribution technique. Some observations on the performance and behavior of the different adaptation methods and best practices for their use are presented. All of the optimization methods are shown to reduce the truncation error one or two orders of magnitude and the discretization error by roughly one order of magnitude for the 1D problems tested. In two dimensions, the optimization-based adaptation methods are able to reduce the discretization error by up to a factor of seven. Mesh equidistribution achieved similar levels of improvement for much less cost compared to the mesh optimization techniques.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleTruncation Error Based Mesh Optimization
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4049038
    journal fristpage041003-1
    journal lastpage041003-20
    page20
    treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian