Construction of a Code Verification Matrix for Heat Conduction With Finite Element Code ApplicationsSource: Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 004::page 041002-1Author:Toptan, Aysenur
,
Porter, Nathan W.
,
Hales, Jason D.
,
Spencer, Benjamin W.
,
Pilch, Martin
,
Williamson, Richard L.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4049037Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: When establishing the pedigree of a simulation tool, code verification is used to ensure that the implemented numerical algorithm is a faithful representation of its underlying mathematical model. During this process, numerical results on various meshes are systematically compared to a reference analytic solution. The selection of analytic solutions can be a laborious process, as it is difficult to establish adequate code confidence without performing redundant work. Here, we address this issue by applying a physics-based process that establishes a set of reference problems. In this process, code simulation options are categorized and systematically tested, which ensures that gaps in testing are easily identified and addressed. The resulting problems are primarily intended for code verification analysis but may also be useful for comparison to other simulation codes, troubleshooting activities, or training exercises. The process is used to select fifteen code verification problems relevant for the one-dimensional steady-state heat conduction equation. These problems are applicable to a wide variety of simulation tools, but, in this work, a demonstration is performed using the finite element-based nuclear fuel performance code BISON. Convergence to the analytic solution at the theoretical rate is quantified for a selection of the problems, which establishes a baseline pedigree for the code. Not only can this standard set of conduction solutions be used for verification of other codes, but also the physics-based process for selecting problems can be utilized to quantify and expand testing for any simulation tool.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Toptan, Aysenur | |
contributor author | Porter, Nathan W. | |
contributor author | Hales, Jason D. | |
contributor author | Spencer, Benjamin W. | |
contributor author | Pilch, Martin | |
contributor author | Williamson, Richard L. | |
date accessioned | 2022-02-05T22:11:19Z | |
date available | 2022-02-05T22:11:19Z | |
date copyright | 11/20/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2020 | |
identifier issn | 2377-2158 | |
identifier other | vvuq_005_04_041002.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277088 | |
description abstract | When establishing the pedigree of a simulation tool, code verification is used to ensure that the implemented numerical algorithm is a faithful representation of its underlying mathematical model. During this process, numerical results on various meshes are systematically compared to a reference analytic solution. The selection of analytic solutions can be a laborious process, as it is difficult to establish adequate code confidence without performing redundant work. Here, we address this issue by applying a physics-based process that establishes a set of reference problems. In this process, code simulation options are categorized and systematically tested, which ensures that gaps in testing are easily identified and addressed. The resulting problems are primarily intended for code verification analysis but may also be useful for comparison to other simulation codes, troubleshooting activities, or training exercises. The process is used to select fifteen code verification problems relevant for the one-dimensional steady-state heat conduction equation. These problems are applicable to a wide variety of simulation tools, but, in this work, a demonstration is performed using the finite element-based nuclear fuel performance code BISON. Convergence to the analytic solution at the theoretical rate is quantified for a selection of the problems, which establishes a baseline pedigree for the code. Not only can this standard set of conduction solutions be used for verification of other codes, but also the physics-based process for selecting problems can be utilized to quantify and expand testing for any simulation tool. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Construction of a Code Verification Matrix for Heat Conduction With Finite Element Code Applications | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 5 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4049037 | |
journal fristpage | 041002-1 | |
journal lastpage | 041002-15 | |
page | 15 | |
tree | Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |