YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Code Verification of a Pressure-Based Solver for Subsonic Compressible Flows

    Source: Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 004::page 041001-1
    Author:
    Muralha, João
    ,
    Eça, Luís
    ,
    Klaij, Christiaan M.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4048750
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Although most flows in maritime applications can be modeled as incompressible, for certain phenomena like sloshing, slamming, and cavitation, this approximation falls short. For these events, it is necessary to consider compressibility effects. This paper presents the first step toward a solver for multiphase compressible flows: a single-phase compressible flow solver for perfect gases. The main purpose of this work is code verification of the solver using the method of manufactured solutions. For the sake of completeness, the governing equations are described in detail including the changes to the SIMPLE algorithm used in the incompressible flow solver to ensure mass conservation and pressure–velocity–density coupling. A manufactured solution for laminar subsonic flow was therefore designed. With properly defined boundary conditions, the observed order of grid convergence matches the formal order, so it can be concluded that the flow solver is free of coding mistakes, to the extent tested by the method of manufactured solutions. The performance of the pressure-based SIMPLE solver is quantified by reporting iteration counts for all grids. Furthermore, the use of pressure–weighted interpolation (PWI), also known as Rhie–Chow interpolation, to avoid spurious pressure oscillations in incompressible flow, though not strictly necessary for compressible flow, does show some benefits in the low Mach number range.
    • Download: (5.070Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Code Verification of a Pressure-Based Solver for Subsonic Compressible Flows

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277087
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMuralha, João
    contributor authorEça, Luís
    contributor authorKlaij, Christiaan M.
    date accessioned2022-02-05T22:11:17Z
    date available2022-02-05T22:11:17Z
    date copyright10/29/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn2377-2158
    identifier othervvuq_005_04_041001.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277087
    description abstractAlthough most flows in maritime applications can be modeled as incompressible, for certain phenomena like sloshing, slamming, and cavitation, this approximation falls short. For these events, it is necessary to consider compressibility effects. This paper presents the first step toward a solver for multiphase compressible flows: a single-phase compressible flow solver for perfect gases. The main purpose of this work is code verification of the solver using the method of manufactured solutions. For the sake of completeness, the governing equations are described in detail including the changes to the SIMPLE algorithm used in the incompressible flow solver to ensure mass conservation and pressure–velocity–density coupling. A manufactured solution for laminar subsonic flow was therefore designed. With properly defined boundary conditions, the observed order of grid convergence matches the formal order, so it can be concluded that the flow solver is free of coding mistakes, to the extent tested by the method of manufactured solutions. The performance of the pressure-based SIMPLE solver is quantified by reporting iteration counts for all grids. Furthermore, the use of pressure–weighted interpolation (PWI), also known as Rhie–Chow interpolation, to avoid spurious pressure oscillations in incompressible flow, though not strictly necessary for compressible flow, does show some benefits in the low Mach number range.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleCode Verification of a Pressure-Based Solver for Subsonic Compressible Flows
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4048750
    journal fristpage041001-1
    journal lastpage041001-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian