YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    REEF3D Wave Generation Interface for Commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes

    Source: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003::page 031902-1
    Author:
    Pakozdi, Csaba
    ,
    Bihs, Hans
    ,
    Kamath, Arun
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4048925
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In recent years, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) developments have shown a trend to combine Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) CFD simulation with other methods such as wave theories or velocity potential-based numerical wave tanks, in order to reduce to computation costs. This is however not a new approach, and there exists a large amount of literature about domain decomposition techniques describing a two way coupling between the RANS CFD models and other methods. One can also observe an increasing popularity in the use of a less sophisticated technique where different fluid solvers are combined with one-way coupling. In these methods, a predefined solution is provided in the far-field, while a three-dimensional (3D) CFD simulation is applied in a limited zone near the structure. The predefined solution is used to specify the background far-field solution. The published solutions use wave theory or a numerical wave tank where the predefined solution is calculated parallel to the RANS solver. In this way, it is possible to reduce the interpolation inaccuracy and the amount of transferred data to the CFD simulation. The disadvantage of this technique is that the far field solver has to be prepared in order to run in parallel with the CFD solver. Due to the one way coupling, it is possible to predefine this information in tables before the CFD simulation. This technique makes it possible to define a general interface between difference solvers without modifying existing codes. This paper presents such a technique where the predefined solution is stored into files.
    • Download: (1.515Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      REEF3D Wave Generation Interface for Commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276579
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPakozdi, Csaba
    contributor authorBihs, Hans
    contributor authorKamath, Arun
    date accessioned2022-02-05T21:55:29Z
    date available2022-02-05T21:55:29Z
    date copyright11/20/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0892-7219
    identifier otheromae_143_3_031902.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276579
    description abstractIn recent years, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) developments have shown a trend to combine Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) CFD simulation with other methods such as wave theories or velocity potential-based numerical wave tanks, in order to reduce to computation costs. This is however not a new approach, and there exists a large amount of literature about domain decomposition techniques describing a two way coupling between the RANS CFD models and other methods. One can also observe an increasing popularity in the use of a less sophisticated technique where different fluid solvers are combined with one-way coupling. In these methods, a predefined solution is provided in the far-field, while a three-dimensional (3D) CFD simulation is applied in a limited zone near the structure. The predefined solution is used to specify the background far-field solution. The published solutions use wave theory or a numerical wave tank where the predefined solution is calculated parallel to the RANS solver. In this way, it is possible to reduce the interpolation inaccuracy and the amount of transferred data to the CFD simulation. The disadvantage of this technique is that the far field solver has to be prepared in order to run in parallel with the CFD solver. Due to the one way coupling, it is possible to predefine this information in tables before the CFD simulation. This technique makes it possible to define a general interface between difference solvers without modifying existing codes. This paper presents such a technique where the predefined solution is stored into files.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleREEF3D Wave Generation Interface for Commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4048925
    journal fristpage031902-1
    journal lastpage031902-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian