YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Design for Nonassembly: Current Status and Future Directions

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 004::page 040801-1
    Author:
    Jung, Sangjin
    ,
    Laureijs, Rianne E.
    ,
    Combemale, Christophe
    ,
    Whitefoot, Kate S.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4047907
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Nonassembled products, which are produced from a raw material and post-processed to a final form without any assembly steps, form a large and potentially growing share of the manufacturing sector. However, the design for manufacturing literature has largely focused on assembled products and does not necessarily apply to nonassembled products. In this paper, we review the literature on design for nonassembly (DFNA) and the broader literature on design for manufacturing that has design guidelines and metrics applicable to nonassembled products, including both monolithic single-part products and nonassembly mechanisms. Our review focuses on guidelines that apply across multiple manufacturing processes. We identify guidelines and metrics that seek to reduce costs as well as provide differentiated products across a product family. We cluster the guidelines using latent semantic analysis and find that existing DFNA guidelines fall into four main categories pertaining to (1) manufacturing process, (2) material, (3) tolerance, and (4) geometry. We also identify existing product family metrics that can be modified for nonassembled products to measure some aspects of these categories. Finally, we discuss possible future research directions to more accurately characterize the relationships between design variables and manufacturing costs, including investigating factors related to the complexity of operations at particular process steps and across process steps.
    • Download: (546.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Design for Nonassembly: Current Status and Future Directions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276297
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJung, Sangjin
    contributor authorLaureijs, Rianne E.
    contributor authorCombemale, Christophe
    contributor authorWhitefoot, Kate S.
    date accessioned2022-02-05T21:46:00Z
    date available2022-02-05T21:46:00Z
    date copyright10/12/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_143_4_040801.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276297
    description abstractNonassembled products, which are produced from a raw material and post-processed to a final form without any assembly steps, form a large and potentially growing share of the manufacturing sector. However, the design for manufacturing literature has largely focused on assembled products and does not necessarily apply to nonassembled products. In this paper, we review the literature on design for nonassembly (DFNA) and the broader literature on design for manufacturing that has design guidelines and metrics applicable to nonassembled products, including both monolithic single-part products and nonassembly mechanisms. Our review focuses on guidelines that apply across multiple manufacturing processes. We identify guidelines and metrics that seek to reduce costs as well as provide differentiated products across a product family. We cluster the guidelines using latent semantic analysis and find that existing DFNA guidelines fall into four main categories pertaining to (1) manufacturing process, (2) material, (3) tolerance, and (4) geometry. We also identify existing product family metrics that can be modified for nonassembled products to measure some aspects of these categories. Finally, we discuss possible future research directions to more accurately characterize the relationships between design variables and manufacturing costs, including investigating factors related to the complexity of operations at particular process steps and across process steps.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDesign for Nonassembly: Current Status and Future Directions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4047907
    journal fristpage040801-1
    journal lastpage040801-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian