YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Incorporating Field Effects Into Functional Product-System Architecting Methods

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 004::page 041402-1
    Author:
    Otto, Kevin
    ,
    Hölttä-Otto, Katja
    ,
    Sanaei, Roozbeh
    ,
    Wood, Kristin L.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4044839
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: System architecture and modularity decisions are inherent to preliminary concept design. Prior modularity research has considered minimizing interactions between modules and increasing the commonality among modular product variants. Effective approaches include function structure partitioning guidelines, affinity analysis, or matrix clustering algorithms. We consider here designs with field constraints, such as situations when elements cannot be placed in certain regions such as a high-temperature field, a high-pressure field, a high magnetic field, etc. which place constraints on modularity choices. Practical design guidelines are developed here for modularity considering field constraints. Two types of guidelines are proposed, field separation and concept generation. The field separation guidelines propose zonal boundaries within which system modules need be confined. The concept generation guidelines propose how to violate the field constraints through new concepts. Moving functionality from one side of a field boundary to the other is nontrivial and involves new concept generation for the modules to function at the higher or lower field values. The guidelines are defined and illustrated via multiple common examples as well as two extended case studies. We demonstrate the approach using field boundaries on an electric motor controller and on a medical contrast injector, and also use of fields to generated novel concepts. The guidelines support for modularity concept and embodiment decisions.
    • Download: (2.929Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Incorporating Field Effects Into Functional Product-System Architecting Methods

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276012
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOtto, Kevin
    contributor authorHölttä-Otto, Katja
    contributor authorSanaei, Roozbeh
    contributor authorWood, Kristin L.
    date accessioned2022-02-04T23:03:34Z
    date available2022-02-04T23:03:34Z
    date copyright4/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_142_4_041402.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276012
    description abstractSystem architecture and modularity decisions are inherent to preliminary concept design. Prior modularity research has considered minimizing interactions between modules and increasing the commonality among modular product variants. Effective approaches include function structure partitioning guidelines, affinity analysis, or matrix clustering algorithms. We consider here designs with field constraints, such as situations when elements cannot be placed in certain regions such as a high-temperature field, a high-pressure field, a high magnetic field, etc. which place constraints on modularity choices. Practical design guidelines are developed here for modularity considering field constraints. Two types of guidelines are proposed, field separation and concept generation. The field separation guidelines propose zonal boundaries within which system modules need be confined. The concept generation guidelines propose how to violate the field constraints through new concepts. Moving functionality from one side of a field boundary to the other is nontrivial and involves new concept generation for the modules to function at the higher or lower field values. The guidelines are defined and illustrated via multiple common examples as well as two extended case studies. We demonstrate the approach using field boundaries on an electric motor controller and on a medical contrast injector, and also use of fields to generated novel concepts. The guidelines support for modularity concept and embodiment decisions.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleIncorporating Field Effects Into Functional Product-System Architecting Methods
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4044839
    journal fristpage041402-1
    journal lastpage041402-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian