Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: A Review on Obtaining Adequate SpecimensSource: Journal of Medical Devices:;2020:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 003::page 034503-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4047543Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: This literature review was conducted to evaluate liver biopsy adequacy, including total core length (TCL), number of portal tracts (PT), fragmentation, and complication rates, as a function of needle type and gauge. A systematic electronic search was performed in the Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, according to the PRISMA statement. Eligible data, describing in vivo percutaneous ultrasound-guided human liver biopsy quality outcomes, were compared to adequacy criteria of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD, TCL ≥ 20 mm, PT ≥ 11). An adequate mean number of PTs was found in 83% of biopsy needles assessed between 2012 and 2019, compared to 0% between 1998 and 2004. For TCL, this was 44% and 33%, respectively. Increasing the needle diameter enhanced TCL (result in 50% of included studies) and PT count (100%), and reduced fragmentation rates (75%), whereas no effect on pain or complications was found (83%). In total, five needle types achieved adequate PT counts, using 16 G (3×), 17 G (1×), or 18 G (1×) needles. Adequacy was reached using either a core needle biopsy (CNB, 3×) approach with one pass, or a fine needle aspiration (FNA, 2×) approach with two passes. The recommendations for biopsy adequacy can be met using 16/17 G FNA or 16/18 G CNB needles. Currently, many publications still present substandard liver biopsy quality outcomes. Although minimizing biopsy invasiveness is desirable, a decreased diameter or number of passes is ill-judged when reliability of biopsy outcomes is at stake.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | de Lange, Danny | |
| contributor author | van den Dobbelsteen, John J. | |
| contributor author | Moelker, Adriaan | |
| contributor author | van de Berg, Nick J. | |
| date accessioned | 2022-02-04T22:17:33Z | |
| date available | 2022-02-04T22:17:33Z | |
| date copyright | 7/16/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2020 | |
| identifier issn | 1932-6181 | |
| identifier other | omae_143_1_012003.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275276 | |
| description abstract | This literature review was conducted to evaluate liver biopsy adequacy, including total core length (TCL), number of portal tracts (PT), fragmentation, and complication rates, as a function of needle type and gauge. A systematic electronic search was performed in the Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, according to the PRISMA statement. Eligible data, describing in vivo percutaneous ultrasound-guided human liver biopsy quality outcomes, were compared to adequacy criteria of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD, TCL ≥ 20 mm, PT ≥ 11). An adequate mean number of PTs was found in 83% of biopsy needles assessed between 2012 and 2019, compared to 0% between 1998 and 2004. For TCL, this was 44% and 33%, respectively. Increasing the needle diameter enhanced TCL (result in 50% of included studies) and PT count (100%), and reduced fragmentation rates (75%), whereas no effect on pain or complications was found (83%). In total, five needle types achieved adequate PT counts, using 16 G (3×), 17 G (1×), or 18 G (1×) needles. Adequacy was reached using either a core needle biopsy (CNB, 3×) approach with one pass, or a fine needle aspiration (FNA, 2×) approach with two passes. The recommendations for biopsy adequacy can be met using 16/17 G FNA or 16/18 G CNB needles. Currently, many publications still present substandard liver biopsy quality outcomes. Although minimizing biopsy invasiveness is desirable, a decreased diameter or number of passes is ill-judged when reliability of biopsy outcomes is at stake. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: A Review on Obtaining Adequate Specimens | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 14 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Medical Devices | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4047543 | |
| journal fristpage | 034503-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 034503-14 | |
| page | 14 | |
| tree | Journal of Medical Devices:;2020:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |