YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Digital Design Automation to Support In Situ Embedding of Functional Objects in Additive Manufacturing

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 011::page 0114501-1
    Author:
    Malviya, Manoj
    ,
    Sinha, Swapnil
    ,
    Berdanier, Catherine
    ,
    Meisel, Nicholas A.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4046889
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Additive manufacturing (AM) offers designers access to the entire volume of an artifact during its build operation, including the embedding of foreign objects, like sensors, motors, and actuators, into the artifact to produce multifunctional products from the build tray. However, the application of embedding requires extensive designer expertise in AM. This research aims to develop a tool to automate design decisions for in situ embedding, eliminating the need for ad hoc design decisions made by experts. Two unique approaches are proposed in this work: shadow projection and voxel simulation. Both of these approaches follow a three-stage methodology to achieve design automation by (1) identifying the optimum orientation for the object, (2) designing cavity, and finally (3) designing the shape converter for a flush surface at the paused layer. The two approaches differ in Stages 2 and 3. Where the shadow projection approach employs a series of point cloud manipulation to geometry of the embedded object, the voxel simulation approach simulates the process of insertion of the embedding geometry into the part voxel by voxel. While both proposed approaches are successful in automating design for embedding complex geometries, they result in tradeoffs between final designs and the time for computation. Computational experiment with six test cases shows that designers must strategically choose from one of the approaches to efficiently automate the digital design for embedding.
    • Download: (1.037Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Digital Design Automation to Support In Situ Embedding of Functional Objects in Additive Manufacturing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275142
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMalviya, Manoj
    contributor authorSinha, Swapnil
    contributor authorBerdanier, Catherine
    contributor authorMeisel, Nicholas A.
    date accessioned2022-02-04T22:13:51Z
    date available2022-02-04T22:13:51Z
    date copyright5/22/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_142_11_114501.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275142
    description abstractAdditive manufacturing (AM) offers designers access to the entire volume of an artifact during its build operation, including the embedding of foreign objects, like sensors, motors, and actuators, into the artifact to produce multifunctional products from the build tray. However, the application of embedding requires extensive designer expertise in AM. This research aims to develop a tool to automate design decisions for in situ embedding, eliminating the need for ad hoc design decisions made by experts. Two unique approaches are proposed in this work: shadow projection and voxel simulation. Both of these approaches follow a three-stage methodology to achieve design automation by (1) identifying the optimum orientation for the object, (2) designing cavity, and finally (3) designing the shape converter for a flush surface at the paused layer. The two approaches differ in Stages 2 and 3. Where the shadow projection approach employs a series of point cloud manipulation to geometry of the embedded object, the voxel simulation approach simulates the process of insertion of the embedding geometry into the part voxel by voxel. While both proposed approaches are successful in automating design for embedding complex geometries, they result in tradeoffs between final designs and the time for computation. Computational experiment with six test cases shows that designers must strategically choose from one of the approaches to efficiently automate the digital design for embedding.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDigital Design Automation to Support In Situ Embedding of Functional Objects in Additive Manufacturing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4046889
    journal fristpage0114501-1
    journal lastpage0114501-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian