YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Resilience Decision-Making for Complex Systems

    Source: ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2020:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Salomon, Julian
    ,
    Broggi, Matteo
    ,
    Kruse, Sebastian
    ,
    Weber, Stefan
    ,
    Beer, Michael
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4044907
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Complex systems—such as gas turbines, industrial plants, and infrastructure networks—are of paramount importance to modern societies. However, these systems are subject to various threats. Novel research does not only focus on monitoring and improving the robustness and reliability of systems but also focus on their recovery from adverse events. The concept of resilience encompasses these developments. Appropriate quantitative measures of resilience can support decision-makers seeking to improve or to design complex systems. In this paper, we develop comprehensive and widely adaptable instruments for resilience-based decision-making. Integrating an appropriate resilience metric together with a suitable systemic risk measure, we design numerically efficient tools aiding decision-makers in balancing different resilience-enhancing investments. The approach allows for a direct comparison between failure prevention arrangements and recovery improvement procedures, leading to optimal tradeoffs with respect to the resilience of a system. In addition, the method is capable of dealing with the monetary aspects involved in the decision-making process. Finally, a grid search algorithm for systemic risk measures significantly reduces the computational effort. In order to demonstrate its wide applicability, the suggested decision-making procedure is applied to a functional model of a multistage axial compressor, and to the U-Bahn and S-Bahn system of Germany's capital Berlin.
    • Download: (1.328Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Resilience Decision-Making for Complex Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4273153
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSalomon, Julian
    contributor authorBroggi, Matteo
    contributor authorKruse, Sebastian
    contributor authorWeber, Stefan
    contributor authorBeer, Michael
    date accessioned2022-02-04T14:11:35Z
    date available2022-02-04T14:11:35Z
    date copyright2020/03/27/
    date issued2020
    identifier issn2332-9017
    identifier otherrisk_006_02_020901.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4273153
    description abstractComplex systems—such as gas turbines, industrial plants, and infrastructure networks—are of paramount importance to modern societies. However, these systems are subject to various threats. Novel research does not only focus on monitoring and improving the robustness and reliability of systems but also focus on their recovery from adverse events. The concept of resilience encompasses these developments. Appropriate quantitative measures of resilience can support decision-makers seeking to improve or to design complex systems. In this paper, we develop comprehensive and widely adaptable instruments for resilience-based decision-making. Integrating an appropriate resilience metric together with a suitable systemic risk measure, we design numerically efficient tools aiding decision-makers in balancing different resilience-enhancing investments. The approach allows for a direct comparison between failure prevention arrangements and recovery improvement procedures, leading to optimal tradeoffs with respect to the resilience of a system. In addition, the method is capable of dealing with the monetary aspects involved in the decision-making process. Finally, a grid search algorithm for systemic risk measures significantly reduces the computational effort. In order to demonstrate its wide applicability, the suggested decision-making procedure is applied to a functional model of a multistage axial compressor, and to the U-Bahn and S-Bahn system of Germany's capital Berlin.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleResilience Decision-Making for Complex Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue2
    journal titleASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4044907
    page20901
    treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2020:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian