YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Numerical Study of Footprint Generation and Reinstallation of Jack-Up Footings

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 010::page 04021107-1
    Author:
    Long Yu
    ,
    Heyue Zhang
    ,
    Jun Liu
    ,
    Ying Huang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002625
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Jack-up leg installation, extraction, and reinstallation near extraction-induced footprints are simulated using the coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian method with a strain-softening soil model. A typical footprint considering soil remolding is summarized based on 29 installation and extraction simulations. The reinstallation behavior of flat-base footings, spudcans, and skirted footings near extraction-induced and idealized conical or cylindrical footprints is compared. The horizontal force and bending moment induced by the footprint are explained in terms of predicted soil flow mechanisms and reaction loads acting on various footing surfaces. Considering soil remolding in a footprint, the results indicate that the soil on the near side of the footprint collapses earlier than that on the far side. The back flow soil on the near side of the footprint leads to obvious negative H loading on the footing leg. Two peaks in the M profile are observed. The first one is due to the footing touching the uneven seabed and the second is due to asynchronous collapse of the near-side and far-side walls of the footprint. The effects of the footing type and offset distance on the reinstallation behavior are discussed. The maximum values of H and M in both the positive and negative ranges during reinstallation are presented. Among the investigated footing types, the skirted footing has the greatest potential for mitigating the footing–footprint interaction problem because it provides the largest vertical resistance but induces the smallest horizontal forces and bending moments.
    • Download: (6.108Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Numerical Study of Footprint Generation and Reinstallation of Jack-Up Footings

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272308
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLong Yu
    contributor authorHeyue Zhang
    contributor authorJun Liu
    contributor authorYing Huang
    date accessioned2022-02-01T21:55:53Z
    date available2022-02-01T21:55:53Z
    date issued10/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002625.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272308
    description abstractJack-up leg installation, extraction, and reinstallation near extraction-induced footprints are simulated using the coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian method with a strain-softening soil model. A typical footprint considering soil remolding is summarized based on 29 installation and extraction simulations. The reinstallation behavior of flat-base footings, spudcans, and skirted footings near extraction-induced and idealized conical or cylindrical footprints is compared. The horizontal force and bending moment induced by the footprint are explained in terms of predicted soil flow mechanisms and reaction loads acting on various footing surfaces. Considering soil remolding in a footprint, the results indicate that the soil on the near side of the footprint collapses earlier than that on the far side. The back flow soil on the near side of the footprint leads to obvious negative H loading on the footing leg. Two peaks in the M profile are observed. The first one is due to the footing touching the uneven seabed and the second is due to asynchronous collapse of the near-side and far-side walls of the footprint. The effects of the footing type and offset distance on the reinstallation behavior are discussed. The maximum values of H and M in both the positive and negative ranges during reinstallation are presented. Among the investigated footing types, the skirted footing has the greatest potential for mitigating the footing–footprint interaction problem because it provides the largest vertical resistance but induces the smallest horizontal forces and bending moments.
    publisherASCE
    titleNumerical Study of Footprint Generation and Reinstallation of Jack-Up Footings
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002625
    journal fristpage04021107-1
    journal lastpage04021107-18
    page18
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian